These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100622)

  • 1. Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section.
    Cheung VY
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2005 Jul; 27(7):674-81. PubMed ID: 16100622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
    Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery.
    Cheung VY; Constantinescu OC; Ahluwalia BS
    J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Nov; 23(11):1441-7. PubMed ID: 15498908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Uharček P; Brešťanský A; Ravinger J; Máňová A; Zajacová M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 292(3):609-12. PubMed ID: 25814295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis.
    Kok N; Wiersma IC; Opmeer BC; de Graaf IM; Mol BW; Pajkrt E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 23576473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Lower Uterine Segment Trial: A pragmatic open multicenter randomized trial].
    Rozenberg P; Deruelle P; Sénat MV; Desbrière R; Winer N; Simon E; Ville Y; Kayem G; Boutron I;
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Apr; 46(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 29625873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound.
    Martins WP; Barra DA; Gallarreta FM; Nastri CO; Filho FM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 19148891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with lower uterine segment thickness near term in women with previous caesarean section.
    Bérubé L; Arial M; Gagnon G; Brassard N; Boutin A; Bujold E
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jun; 33(6):581-7. PubMed ID: 21846447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Kushtagi P; Garepalli S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 283(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 20145938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness: is it truly predictive of uterine rupture?
    Cheung VYT
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Feb; 30(2):148-151. PubMed ID: 18254997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
    Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurements of the lower uterine segment during gestation.
    Ginsberg Y; Goldstein I; Lowenstein L; Weiner Z
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 May; 41(4):214-7. PubMed ID: 23505018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
    Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.
    Brahmalakshmy BL; Kushtagi P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):755-62. PubMed ID: 25209351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Does Lower Uterine Segment Thickness Measurement Improve Birth Planning After Previous Cesarean Section?].
    Schmitz J; Stepan H; Schrey-Petersen S; Hoffmann J
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2019 Dec; 223(6):350-358. PubMed ID: 31163458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review.
    Jastrow N; Chaillet N; Roberge S; Morency AM; Lacasse Y; Bujold E
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):321-327. PubMed ID: 20500938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic assessment has high sensitivity for pregnant women with previous cesarean section occurring uterine dehiscence and rupture: A STARD-compliant article.
    Cui X; Wu S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(31):e21448. PubMed ID: 32756164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean.
    Gotoh H; Masuzaki H; Yoshida A; Yoshimura S; Miyamura T; Ishimaru T
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):596-600. PubMed ID: 10725496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting Uterine Rupture Risk Using Lower Uterine Segment Measurement During Pregnancy With Cesarean History: How Reliable Is It? A Review.
    McLeish SF; Murchison AB; Smith DM; Ghahremani T; Johnson IM; Magann EF
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2023 May; 78(5):302-308. PubMed ID: 37263964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technique of sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment in women with previous cesarean delivery: a prospective, pre/intraoperative comparative ultrasound study.
    Seliger G; Chaoui K; Lautenschläger C; Riemer M; Tchirikov M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Aug; 298(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 29948165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.