439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100801)
1. Changing attitudes in Florida's 'right to die' law.
Grimes GK
Stetson Law Rev; 1985; 14(2):375-95. PubMed ID: 16100801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
Dyke MC
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
Calder M
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Advance directives: an overview of changing right-to-die laws.
Fade AE
J Nurs Law; 1995; 2(3):27-38. PubMed ID: 12545976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
Hunt WE
Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
Martino M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
Roach CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The 'right to die': legislative and judicial developments.
Horan DJ
Linacre Q; 1979 Feb; 46(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 11661637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimenting with the "right to die" in the laboratory of the states.
Eaton TA; Larson EJ
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1253-326. PubMed ID: 12569937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
Gaumer CP; Griffith PR
S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment.
Ouellette AR
Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The constitution and the right to die.
Peters PG
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 16038075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The unconstitutional treatment of Nancy Cruzan.
Gasner MR
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1990; 7(Part 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 16044596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The CCAR responsum on end of life issues: an American legal perspective.
Saperstein D; Mishkin D
CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):36-45. PubMed ID: 15712421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Wrongful living": resuscitation as tortious interference with a patient's right to give informed refusal.
Knapp WC; Hamilton F
North KY Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):253-76. PubMed ID: 16044603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. States tackle flood of 'right-to-die' bills.
Alsofrom J
Am Med News; 1977 Jun; 20(25):11-2. PubMed ID: 11661479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The living will--death with dignity or mechanical vitality.
Wilson PH
Cumberland Law Rev; 1979; 10(1):163-207. PubMed ID: 11661825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
