These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100801)
1. Changing attitudes in Florida's 'right to die' law. Grimes GK Stetson Law Rev; 1985; 14(2):375-95. PubMed ID: 16100801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no? O'Brien EJ Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes. Dyke MC Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law. Calder M Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia. Davidson SI N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act. Hunt WE Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment. Martino M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence. Roach CA Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The 'right to die': legislative and judicial developments. Horan DJ Linacre Q; 1979 Feb; 46(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 11661637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimenting with the "right to die" in the laboratory of the states. Eaton TA; Larson EJ Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1253-326. PubMed ID: 12569937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide. Gaumer CP; Griffith PR S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment. Ouellette AR Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The constitution and the right to die. Peters PG Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 16038075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The unconstitutional treatment of Nancy Cruzan. Gasner MR N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1990; 7(Part 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 16044596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The CCAR responsum on end of life issues: an American legal perspective. Saperstein D; Mishkin D CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):36-45. PubMed ID: 15712421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Wrongful living": resuscitation as tortious interference with a patient's right to give informed refusal. Knapp WC; Hamilton F North KY Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):253-76. PubMed ID: 16044603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. States tackle flood of 'right-to-die' bills. Alsofrom J Am Med News; 1977 Jun; 20(25):11-2. PubMed ID: 11661479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The living will--death with dignity or mechanical vitality. Wilson PH Cumberland Law Rev; 1979; 10(1):163-207. PubMed ID: 11661825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]