These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100807)

  • 1. A reversible decision on consent to sterilization.
    Lee S
    Law Q Rev; 1987 Oct; 103():513-5. PubMed ID: 16100807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient autonomy and consent to treatment: the role of the law?
    Brazier M
    Leg Stud; 1987 Jul; 7(2):169-93. PubMed ID: 16100793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gold v. Haringey Health Authority.
    Great Britain. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Mar 10-12, Apr 14 (decision date); [1987] 2():888-96. PubMed ID: 11648563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consent to treatment--how informed is informed consent?
    Brahams D
    Med Leg J; 1984; 52(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 11658727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dries v. Gregor: a case study of informed consent doctrine in New York.
    Schreiber JA
    N Y State Bar J; 1981 Oct; 53(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 16044597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Family accuses doctors of failing to warn of risk.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Apr; 314(7089):1224. PubMed ID: 11644924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).
    Annas GJ
    Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure.
    Chalmers D; Schwartz R
    Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The patient's right to know -- a comparative view.
    Giesen D; Hayes J
    Anglo Am Law Rev; 1992; 21(2):101-22. PubMed ID: 11659667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance?
    Teff H
    Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why Britain can't afford informed consent.
    Schwartz R; Grubb A
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Aug; 15(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 4055351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The temporal element of informed consent.
    Black V; Gibson E
    Health Law Rev; 2004; 13(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15839002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent: a Canadian case in a British perspective.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1987 Oct; 2(8566):1038. PubMed ID: 2889956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The meaning of informed consent.
    Whitfield A
    Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California.
    Churchward AB
    Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practice makes perfect: experience-related information should fall within the purview of Pennsylvania's doctrine of informed consent.
    Rostolsky BM
    Duquesne Law Rev; 2002; 40(3):543-60. PubMed ID: 15212018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Excessive risk disclosure: the effects of the law on medical practice.
    Heywood R
    Med Law Int; 2005; 7(2):93-112. PubMed ID: 16622971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doctor's duty to inform patient of risk.
    Times (Lond); 1984 Feb; ():24. PubMed ID: 11647764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8376):578-9. PubMed ID: 11644281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital.
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Feb; [1984] 1():1018-36. PubMed ID: 11648155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.