These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100810)
61. A constitutional analysis of involuntary civil commitment in Wyoming. Keiter RB Land Water Law Rev; 1980; 15(1):141-206. PubMed ID: 11665248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Civil commitment of the mentally ill: an overview. Mills MJ Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci; 1986 Mar; (484):28-41. PubMed ID: 10276573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Outpatient commitment and procedural due process. Player CT Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 38():100-13. PubMed ID: 25748886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The transinstitutionalization of the mentally ill. Slovenko R Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 2003; 29(3):641-60. PubMed ID: 15868685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. The ambiguous ethics of involuntary treatment for the elderly. Callahan S Health Prog; 1993 Dec; 74(10):64, 75. PubMed ID: 10130098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Access to medical and psychiatric records: proposed legislation. Felch E Albany Law Rev; 1976; 40(3):580-617. PubMed ID: 11664692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. The health care proxy for mental illness: can it work and should we want it to? Sales GN Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):161-79. PubMed ID: 8364235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Constitutionally guaranteed rights of the mentally ill. Cazalas M South Univ Law Rev; 1975; 2(1):9-38. PubMed ID: 12083089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die. Stricker BW McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health acts. Large MM; Ryan CJ; Nielssen OB; Hayes RA J Med Ethics; 2008 Dec; 34(12):877-81. PubMed ID: 19043114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Civil commitment in New York City: an analysis of practice. McGraw BD Pace Law Rev; 1985; 5(2):259-307. PubMed ID: 16998977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Limiting the therapeutic orgy: mental patients' right to refuse treatment. Plotkin R Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1977; 72(4):461-525. PubMed ID: 11664913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Arkansas involuntary civil commitment: in the rear guard of the due process revolution. Knight DA Ark Law Rev; 1978; 32(2):294-346. PubMed ID: 11664973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Australian and Canadian mental health Acts compared. Gray JE; McSherry BM; O'Reilly RL; Weller PJ Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2010 Dec; 44(12):1126-31. PubMed ID: 21070108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Psychiatric power and informed consent in post-World War II Canada. James A Health Law Can; 2002 Jun; 22(4):101-12. PubMed ID: 12122937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Psychosurgery: a case for regulation. Peters JD; Lee J Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1978; 1978(3):383-411. PubMed ID: 11665113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Informing ED patients of the initiation of a psychiatric 72-hours hold. Reeves RR; Torres RA Am J Emerg Med; 2004 Oct; 22(6):495-6. PubMed ID: 15520950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Role of family and carers in compulsory mental health treatment. Arya DK Int J Soc Psychiatry; 2014 Feb; 60(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 24459246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]