These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100825)

  • 21. A response to Purdy.
    Dodds S; Jones K
    Bioethics; 1989 Jan; 3(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 11650111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How (not) to think about surrogacy and other reproductive innovations.
    Shapiro MH
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):647-80. PubMed ID: 11655181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The ethics of babymaking.
    Sherwin S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 11644700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Privacy, surrogacy, and the Baby M case.
    Allen AL
    Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1759-92. PubMed ID: 11649250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meanings and strategies of reproductive control: current feminist approaches to reproductive technology.
    Vanderwater B
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(3):215-30. PubMed ID: 11651474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Providing protection for collaborative noncoital reproduction: surrogate motherhood and other new procreative technologies, and the right of intimate association.
    Ikemoto LC
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(4):1273-309. PubMed ID: 11650138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An essay on surrogacy and feminist thought.
    Mahoney J
    Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):81-8. PubMed ID: 3205045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Views on surrogacy harden after Baby M ruling.
    Barron J
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Apr; ():A1, B2. PubMed ID: 11646559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Legislating surrogacy: a partial answer to feminist criticism.
    Brandel A
    MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):488-527. PubMed ID: 11653264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology.
    Parks J
    Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19076939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The deflective power of reproductive technologies: the impact on women.
    Woliver LR
    Women Polit; 1989; 9(3):17-47. PubMed ID: 11659737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A civil liberties analysis of surrogacy arrangements.
    Gostin L
    Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 3060686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The eugenic and racist premise of reproductive rights and population control.
    Akhter F
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The moral imperative for ectogenesis.
    Smajdor A
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 17695628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Commentary on 'Opt-out HIV testing: an ethical analysis of women's reproductive rights'.
    Seloilwe ES
    Nurs Ethics; 2011 Sep; 18(5):743-5. PubMed ID: 21642331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reproductive gifts and gift giving: the altruistic woman.
    Raymond JG
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(6):7-11. PubMed ID: 2283292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Industrial capitalism's hostility to childbirth, responsible childbearing, and eugenic reproductive policies in the first third of the 20th Century.
    Zimmermann S
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 11650962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The limits of compromise: the range of perspectives on women's reproductive rights in Poland.
    Paprzycka E; Dec-Pietrowska J; Lech M
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Apr; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 30730216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Revisiting child-based objections to commercial surrogacy.
    Hanna JK
    Bioethics; 2010 Sep; 24(7):341-7. PubMed ID: 20690918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.
    Arellano Mde J
    Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 20739439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.