These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100836)

  • 1. The price of abortion: sixteen years later.
    Chopko ME; Harris PH; Alvare HM
    Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):18, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 16100836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician assistant as abortion provider: lessons from Vermont, New York, and Montana.
    Schirmer JT
    Hastings Law J; 1997 Nov; 49(1):253-88. PubMed ID: 14758819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Whither the family and family privacy?
    Jones TR; Peterman L
    Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The public health impact of legal abortion: 30 years later.
    Cates W; Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2003; 35(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 12602754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000.
    Arkes H
    Hum Life Rev; 2000; 26(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 12530369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
    Bradford CS
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
    Bourne RW
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion in America: is compromise possible?
    Hodges SA
    J Legal Stud; 1999-2000; 10():175-89. PubMed ID: 15991406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Did abortion legalization reduce the number of unwanted children? Evidence from adoptions.
    Bitler M; Madeline Z
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2002; 34(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11990636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The women of Roe v. Wade.
    Glendon MA
    Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
    Smolin DM
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights.
    Dailard C
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lochner redeemed: family privacy after Troxel and Carhart.
    Meyer DD
    UCLA Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 48(5):1125-90. PubMed ID: 16273684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go.
    Halloran L
    US News World Rep; 2005 Dec; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.