270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16100837)
1. Abortion rights: why conservatives are wrong.
Edwards RB
Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):19, 21, 23. PubMed ID: 16100837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion: rights, responsibilities, obligations.
Walsh KP
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):63-4. PubMed ID: 21161852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Manninen's defense of abortion rights is unsuccessful.
Marquis D
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):56-7. PubMed ID: 21161848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What human life amendments mean and don't mean.
Murphy TF
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):47-8. PubMed ID: 21161842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The unacknowledged consensus on abortion.
Watson K
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):57-9. PubMed ID: 21161849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Defending my "rethinking" of Roe.
Manninen BA
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):W3-5. PubMed ID: 21161830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The concept of brain life: shifting the abortion standard without imposing religious values.
Cornwell JR
Duquesne Law Rev; 1987; 23(5):471-9. PubMed ID: 16100797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States.
Jubb ED
Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition.
Manninen BA
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):33-46. PubMed ID: 21161841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetuses are neither violinists nor violators.
Eberl JT
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):53-4. PubMed ID: 21161846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and moral arguments from analogy.
Nobis N; Jarr-Koroma AS
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):59-61. PubMed ID: 21161850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and human rights.
Horan DJ; Gorby JD
Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):21-33. PubMed ID: 11663654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Judicial power and the right to life.
Noonan JT
Tablet; 1973 Apr; 227(6927):323-6. PubMed ID: 11660868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protection of the unborn--introduction of a joint resolution.
Buckley JL
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 May; 119(82):S9973-92. PubMed ID: 11663377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.
Stith R
William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role.
Witherspoon JP
Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women.
Curran WJ
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1983; 61(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 6343918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there life after Roe? How to think about the fetus.
Kissling F
Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):10-8. PubMed ID: 16538752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn.
King PA
Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Justice and the fetus: Rawls, children, and abortion.
Shaw DM
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Jan; 20(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 21223613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
