126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16101335)
1. Consistency of cytology diagnosis for cervical cancer between two laboratories.
Sriamporn S; Kritpetcharat O; Nieminen P; Suwanrungraung K; Kamsa-ard S; Parkin DM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 16101335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The coverage of cervical cancer screening in Khon Kaen, northeast Thailand.
Kritpetcharat O; Suwanrungruang K; Sriamporn S; Kamsa-Ard S; Kritpetcharat P; Pengsaa P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2003; 4(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 12875621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control.
Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P
Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulatory closure of cervical cytology laboratories: recommendations for a public health response.
MMWR Recomm Rep; 1997 Dec; 46(RR-17):1-19. PubMed ID: 9409538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histopathological outcomes of women with abnormal cervical cytology: a review of literature in Thailand.
Kietpeerakool C; Tangjitgamol S; Srisomboon J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(16):6489-94. PubMed ID: 25169475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the cytologic diagnosis of normal and abnormal metaplastic squamous cells in pap smears.
Gupta DK; Komaromy-Hiller G; Raab SS; Nath ME
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(5):697-703. PubMed ID: 11575646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving consistency in cervical cytology reporting.
Mitchell H
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Oct; 85(19):1592-6. PubMed ID: 8411232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Glandular Lesions of the Cervix in Clinical Practice: A Cytology, Histology, and Human Papillomavirus Correlation Study From 2 Institutions.
Miller RA; Mody DR; Tams KC; Thrall MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 139(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 25951104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of cytology with Pap smears taken by a gynecologist and with a self-sampling device.
Pengsaa P; Sriamporn S; Kritpetcharat O; Kamsa-Ard S; Suwanrungruang K; Noda S; Kakudo K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2003; 4(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 12875620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How accurate is cytological diagnosis of cervical glandular lesions?
Moreira MA; Longatto Filho A; Castelo A; de Barros MR; Silva AP; Thomann P; Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Dores GB
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Apr; 36(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 18335557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The burden of prevention: downstream consequences of Pap smear testing in the elderly.
Sirovich BE; Gottlieb DJ; Fisher ES
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 14738656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metaanalysis of the accuracy of rapid prescreening relative to full screening of pap smears.
Arbyn M; Schenck U; Ellison E; Hanselaar A
Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12589640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of specimen adequacy reproducibility: an Italian experience.
Montanari G; Confortini M; Bellomi A; Cocchi V; Dalla Palma P; D'Ambrosio E; Giovagnoli MR; Navone R; Ronco G;
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 12672101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
