137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16102061)
1. Familiarity breeds searching: infants reverse their novelty preferences when reaching for hidden objects.
Shinskey JL; Munakata Y
Psychol Sci; 2005 Aug; 16(8):596-600. PubMed ID: 16102061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detailed analysis of the behavior of Lister and Wistar rats in anxiety, object recognition and object location tasks.
Ennaceur A; Michalikova S; Bradford A; Ahmed S
Behav Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 159(2):247-66. PubMed ID: 15817188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recognition memory in tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) after repeated familiarization sessions.
Khani A; Rainer G
Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):364-71. PubMed ID: 22521708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The sound of darkness: why do auditory cues aid infants' search for objects hidden by darkness but not by visible occluders?
Shinskey JL
Dev Psychol; 2008 Nov; 44(6):1715-25. PubMed ID: 18999333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Something old, something new: a developmental transition from familiarity to novelty preferences with hidden objects.
Shinskey JL; Munakata Y
Dev Sci; 2010 Mar; 13(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 20136935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spaced initial stimulus familiarization enhances novelty preference in Long-Evans rats.
Anderson MJ; Jablonski SA; Klimas DB
Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 18358637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ebb and flow of infant attentional preferences: evidence for long-term recognition memory in 3-month-olds.
Courage ML; Howe ML
J Exp Child Psychol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):26-53. PubMed ID: 9679078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early differentiation within the animate domain: are humans something special?
Pauen S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):134-51. PubMed ID: 10620377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can chimpanzee infants (Pan troglodytes) form categorical representations in the same manner as human infants (Homo sapiens)?
Murai C; Kosugi D; Tomonaga M; Tanaka M; Matsuzawa T; Itakura S
Dev Sci; 2005 May; 8(3):240-54. PubMed ID: 15819756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What do infants know about continuous quantity?
Gao F; Levine SC; Huttenlocher J
J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Sep; 77(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 10964457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory for objects, places, and contexts.
Mumby DG; Gaskin S; Glenn MJ; Schramek TE; Lehmann H
Learn Mem; 2002; 9(2):49-57. PubMed ID: 11992015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of the inter-phase delay interval in the spontaneous object recognition test for pigs.
Kornum BR; Thygesen KS; Nielsen TR; Knudsen GM; Lind NM
Behav Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 17524499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-manual transfer of object texture and shape in human neonates.
Sann C; Streri A
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):698-703. PubMed ID: 18006025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perirhinal cortex lesions impair tests of object recognition memory but spare novelty detection.
Olarte-Sánchez CM; Amin E; Warburton EC; Aggleton JP
Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 42(12):3117-27. PubMed ID: 26474445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do rats really express neophobia towards novel objects? Experimental evidence from exposure to novelty and to an object recognition task in an open space and an enclosed space.
Ennaceur A; Michalikova S; Chazot PL
Behav Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 197(2):417-34. PubMed ID: 18992282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of stimulus 'value' in infant novelty preference.
Najm-Briscoe RG; Thomas DG; Overton S
Dev Psychobiol; 2000 Nov; 37(3):176-85. PubMed ID: 11044864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The onset of reaching significantly impacts how infants explore both objects and their bodies.
Lobo MA; Galloway JC
Infant Behav Dev; 2013 Feb; 36(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 23261785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel object exploration in mice: not all objects are created equal.
Heyser CJ; Chemero A
Behav Processes; 2012 Mar; 89(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 22183090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of adults' affective expression and direction of visual gaze on 12-month-olds' visual preferences for an object following a 5-minute, 1-day, or 1-month delay.
Flom R; Johnson S
Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Mar; 29(Pt 1):64-85. PubMed ID: 21288254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Encoding the goal of an object-directed but uncompleted reaching action in 6- and 9-month-old infants.
Daum MM; Prinz W; Aschersleben G
Dev Sci; 2008 Jul; 11(4):607-19. PubMed ID: 18576968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
