These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16102079)

  • 1. Prevention of postoperative tooth sensitivity: a preliminary clinical trial.
    Sobral MA; Garone-Netto N; Luz MA; Santos AP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):661-8. PubMed ID: 16102079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentin desensitizing effects of Gluma Alternate, Health-Dent Desensitizer and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose.
    Dondi dall'Orologio G; Lorenzi R; Anselmi M; Opisso V
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 10649929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching adhesive on the reduction of postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
    Hajizadeh H; Akbari M; Ghavamnasiri M; Abedini S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):9-16. PubMed ID: 18997911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of the role of glutardialdehyde in a one-bottle adhesive.
    Dondi dall'Orologio G; Lone A; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 12537345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized clinical trial of cusp-replacing resin composite restorations: efficiency and short-term effectiveness.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters FJ; Creugers NH; Burgersdijk RC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 16900817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The prevalence of postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with Class II composite resin restorations.
    Borgmeijer PJ; Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 1939803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the efficacy of potassium nitrate and Gluma desensitizer in the reduction of hypersensitivity in teeth with full-crown preparations.
    Jalalian E; Meraji N; Mirzaei M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19142258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effectiveness of Systemp.desensitizer in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity.
    Stewardson DA; Crisp RJ; McHugh S; Lendenmann U; Burke FJ
    Prim Dent Care; 2004 Jul; 11(3):71-6. PubMed ID: 15242562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 12413217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of total-etch and self-etch bonding systems for preventing sensitivity in Class 1 and Class 2 restorations.
    Perry RD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Jan; 28(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 17278627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the link between a new dentinal desensitizer and dentine.
    Brenna F; Tagliabue A; Levrini L; Tettamanti L; Quacci D; Bergamaschi M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2003 Sep; 52(9):413-21, 421-5. PubMed ID: 14608247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors associated with postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
    Al-Omari QD; Al-Omari WM; Omar R
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2009; 55(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 19455848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical effectiveness of two agents on the treatment of tooth cervical hypersensitivity.
    Kakaboura A; Rahiotis C; Thomaidis S; Doukoudakis S
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 16296439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of bonded composite restorations in the treatment of painful, cracked teeth: six-month clinical evaluation.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JM
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 12877415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treating patients with CARE (comfortable aesthetic restorations): reducing postoperative sensitivity in direct posterior composite restorations.
    Ward DH
    Dent Today; 2004 Aug; 23(8):60, 62, 64-5. PubMed ID: 15354708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitudes and expectations of treating deep caries: a PEARL Network survey.
    Oen KT; Thompson VP; Vena D; Caufield PW; Curro F; Dasanayake A; Ship JA; Lindblad A
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 17511360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.