These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16102279)

  • 1. Are we talking about the butterflies or a butterfly effect? Comment on 'No country is an island'.
    Kahraman S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Jul; 11(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 16102279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No country is an island: comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law.
    Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Jul; 11(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 16102276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concerns of sex selection and regulation in the report on Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law.
    Bahadur G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Jul; 11(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 16102278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to 'No country is an island: comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law'.
    Bhargava PM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Jul; 11(1):12. PubMed ID: 16102277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further comment on the House of Commons' report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law.
    Schulman JD
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Aug; 11(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 16168208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Questioning the assumptions in the debate on assisted reproduction: comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law.
    Pennings G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Aug; 11(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 16168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procreative liberty, or collective responsibility? Comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law, and on Dahl's response.
    Shenfield F
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Aug; 11(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 16168207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A feminist is a person who answers "yes" to the question, "are women human?": an argument against the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for gender selection.
    Downing KK
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(2):431-60. PubMed ID: 16538759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. WHAT ROLE SHOULD PUBLIC OPINION PLAY IN ETHICO-LEGAL DECISION MAKING? THE EXAMPLE OF SELECTING SEX FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS USING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS.
    Fovargue S; Bennett R
    Med Law Rev; 2016; 24(1):34-58. PubMed ID: 26811500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond IVF: should parents be free to decide what is acceptable?
    New Sci; 2006 Oct 21-27; 192(2574):5. PubMed ID: 17165217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The power to choose.
    Grayling AC
    New Sci; 2005 Apr 9-15; 186(2494):17. PubMed ID: 16007761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Community concerns about sex selection: research as a way forward - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
    McMahon CA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Mar; 8(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 15038893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection.
    Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Mar; 8(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 15038888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consultation on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2005; (210):10-3. PubMed ID: 16471005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex selection.
    Choo V
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8840):298-9. PubMed ID: 11643229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Australian attitudes toward sex-selection technology.
    Kippen R; Evans A; Gray E
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Apr; 95(5):1824-6. PubMed ID: 21163475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: is there anything the United Kingdom can learn from the Australian experience?
    de Souza M
    J Law Med; 2012 Sep; 20(1):165-77. PubMed ID: 23156654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender preferences and demand for preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in Pakistan.
    Zubair F; Dahl E; Sher Shah S; Ahmed M; Brosig B
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Feb; 22(2):605-9. PubMed ID: 17062579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex selection and abortion: a case for legal re-evaluation?
    McHale JV
    Br J Nurs; 2012 Mar 8-21; 21(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 22399004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gender variety as a valid choice: a comment on the HFEA - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
    Robertson JA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Mar; 8(3):270-1. PubMed ID: 15038891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.