These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16103645)

  • 1. Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors.
    Senn P; Kompis M; Vischer M; Haeusler R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(6):342-52. PubMed ID: 16103645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):335-49. PubMed ID: 25618064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):702-13. PubMed ID: 20548238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: speech recognition, sound localization, and parental reports.
    Asp F; Mäki-Torkko E; Karltorp E; Harder H; Hergils L; Eskilsson G; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Nov; 51(11):817-32. PubMed ID: 22937981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies.
    van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Pesch J; Vandali A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2249-63. PubMed ID: 18397030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor.
    Lawson DT; Wilson BS; Zerbi M; van den Honert C; Finley CC; Farmer JC; McElveen JT; Roush PA
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 9831150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel RJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 15205551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Successful outcomes of cochlear implantation in long-term unilateral deafness: brain plasticity?
    Távora-Vieira D; Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Maric V; Rajan GP
    Neuroreport; 2013 Sep; 24(13):724-9. PubMed ID: 23880870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children.
    Litovsky RY; Parkinson A; Arcaroli J; Peters R; Lake J; Johnstone P; Yu G
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 15148192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Seeber BU; Fastl H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1030-42. PubMed ID: 18247905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sound-direction identification with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Neuman AC; Haravon A; Sislian N; Waltzman SB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 17204900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.