These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2192-9. PubMed ID: 16205346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion. Willems P Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Freeman BJ; Davenport J Eur Spine J; 2006 Aug; 15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S439-47. PubMed ID: 16862432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and U.S. investigation device exemption study. Zigler JE Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S163-6. PubMed ID: 14560187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months. Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature. Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]