161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16104009)
1. The impact of partial-volume effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.
Chen JJ; Smith MR; Frayne R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):390-9. PubMed ID: 16104009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attempts to improve absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging: a simplified T1-weighted steady-state cerebral blood volume approach.
Wirestam R; Knutsson L; Risberg J; Börjesson S; Larsson EM; Gustafson L; Passant U; Ståhlberg F
Acta Radiol; 2007 Jun; 48(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 17520432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reassessing the clinical efficacy of two MR quantitative DSC PWI CBF algorithms following cross-calibration with PET images.
Chen JJ; Frayne R; Smith MR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1251-63. PubMed ID: 15798320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bolus dispersion issues related to the quantification of perfusion MRI data.
Calamante F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):718-22. PubMed ID: 16261569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation.
Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal location for arterial input function measurements near the middle cerebral artery in first-pass perfusion MRI.
Bleeker EJ; van Buchem MA; van Osch MJ
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2009 Apr; 29(4):840-52. PubMed ID: 19142193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Partial volume effects on arterial input functions: shape and amplitude distortions and their correction.
van Osch MJ; van der Grond J; Bakker CJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):704-9. PubMed ID: 16261570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in normal volunteers: correlation between Xe-133 SPECT and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Knutsson L; Börjesson S; Larsson EM; Risberg J; Gustafson L; Passant U; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):913-20. PubMed ID: 17896379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of quantitative dynamic susceptibility-contrast MRI perfusion estimates obtained using different contrast-agent administration schemes at 3T.
Wirestam R; Thilmann O; Knutsson L; Björkman-Burtscher IM; Larsson EM; Ståhlberg F
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e86-91. PubMed ID: 19720489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robust dynamic susceptibility contrast MR perfusion using 4D nonlinear noise filters.
Kosior JC; Kosior RK; Frayne R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1514-22. PubMed ID: 17968968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perfusion-related parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging compared with CBV and CBF measured by dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR technique.
Wirestam R; Borg M; Brockstedt S; Lindgren A; Holtås S; Ståhlberg F
Acta Radiol; 2001 Mar; 42(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 11281143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the arterial input function on the measured perfusion values and infarct volumetric in acute cerebral ischemia evaluated by perfusion computed tomography.
Bisdas S; Konstantinou GN; Gurung J; Lehnert T; Donnerstag F; Becker H; Vogl TJ; Koh TS
Invest Radiol; 2007 Mar; 42(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 17287644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Kotys MS; Akbudak E; Markham J; Conturo TE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):598-611. PubMed ID: 17326084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study.
Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reexamining the quantification of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus dispersion.
Ko L; Salluzzi M; Frayne R; Smith M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):639-43. PubMed ID: 17326085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tracer delay correction of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.
Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2005 Mar; 25(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 15674238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calculation of cerebral perfusion parameters using regional arterial input functions identified by factor analysis.
Knutsson L; Larsson EM; Thilmann O; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):444-53. PubMed ID: 16523467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: requirements and signal options.
Conturo TE; Akbudak E; Kotys MS; Chen ML; Chun SJ; Hsu RM; Sweeney CC; Markham J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 16261571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated perfusion-weighted MRI using localized arterial input functions.
Lorenz C; Benner T; Chen PJ; Lopez CJ; Ay H; Zhu MW; Menezes NM; Aronen H; Karonen J; Liu Y; Nuutinen J; Sorensen AG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1133-9. PubMed ID: 16969793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deconvolution with simple extrapolation for improved cerebral blood flow measurement in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging during acute ischemic stroke.
MacDonald ME; Smith MR; Frayne R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jun; 29(5):620-9. PubMed ID: 21546188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
