These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Pressure distribution and energy flow in the focal region of two different electromagnetic shock wave sources. Folberth W; Köhler G; Rohwedder A; Matura E J Stone Dis; 1992 Jan; 4(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10149172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Technical improvements and clinical study for extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptor]. Jiang F Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 37(5):340-2. PubMed ID: 24409790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kidney damage in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a numerical approach for different shock profiles. Weinberg K; Ortiz M Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2009 Aug; 8(4):285-99. PubMed ID: 18807077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of renal injury with a clinical dual head lithotriptor delivering 240 shock waves per minute. Handa RK; McAteer JA; Evan AP; Connors BA; Pishchalnikov YA; Gao S J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):884-9. PubMed ID: 19095269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: one-year experience with the Dornier lithotripter. 1985. Fuchs G; Miller K; Rassweiler J; Eisenberger F Eur Urol; 2006 Sep; 50(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 16972343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [New approach to improving efficacy and objective assessment of the extracorporeal lithotripsy]. Dzeranov NK; Moskalenko SA Urologiia; 2004; (6):6-9. PubMed ID: 15719721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Development, instrumentation, and current status. Lingeman JE Urol Clin North Am; 1997 Feb; 24(1):185-211. PubMed ID: 9048861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy in an isolated calcification in the equine ligamentum nuchae--case report]. Braun S; Lafrenz R Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005 Feb; 112(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 15787317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design of the dual stone locating system on an extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptor. Pu YR; Manousakas I; Liang SM; Chang CC Sensors (Basel); 2013 Jan; 13(1):1319-28. PubMed ID: 23337335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The modelling of the cavitation processes during the focusing of the shock wave in an electrodynamic lithotriptor]. Andriianov IuV; Li AA; Teslenko VS Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult; 1992; (4):42-8. PubMed ID: 1455798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi. Davenport K; Minervini A; Keoghane S; Parkin J; Keeley FX; Timoney AG J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2055-8; discussion 2058. PubMed ID: 17070254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and the "end of the stone age". de la Rosette JJ Eur Urol; 2006 Sep; 50(3):400-1. PubMed ID: 16824678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and testing of second generation extracorporeal shock-wave lithotriptor. Begun FP; Lawson RK; Cauley JE; Kearns CM; Foley D; Middelton WD Urology; 1990 Sep; 36(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 2203197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhanced kidney stone fragmentation by short delay tandem conventional and modified lithotriptor shock waves: a numerical analysis. Tham LM; Lee HP; Lu C J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):314-9. PubMed ID: 17499770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]