These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16104964)

  • 1. Autogenous bone chips: influence of a new piezoelectric device (Piezosurgery) on chip morphology, cell viability and differentiation.
    Chiriac G; Herten M; Schwarz F; Rothamel D; Becker J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Sep; 32(9):994-9. PubMed ID: 16104964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of graft cell viability-efficacy of piezoelectric versus manual bone scraper technique.
    Pekovits K; Wildburger A; Payer M; Hutter H; Jakse N; Dohr G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 22014939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of harvesting technique and donor site location on in vitro growth of osteoblastlike cells from facial bone.
    Pradel W; Tenbieg P; Lauer G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(6):860-6. PubMed ID: 16392342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel bone scraper for intraoral harvesting: a device for filling small bone defects.
    Zaffe D; D'Avenia F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):525-33. PubMed ID: 17441981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of effects on bone tissue of different osteotomy techniques.
    Tetè S; Vinci R; Zizzari V; Cingano L; Bollero R; D'Apolito G; Benzo L; Dolci A; Mortellaro C; Gherlone E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1424-9. PubMed ID: 19816272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of bone harvesting techniques on cell viability and the release of growth factors of autografts.
    Miron RJ; Gruber R; Hedbom E; Saulacic N; Zhang Y; Sculean A; Bosshardt DD; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 22375920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different harvesting methods from the flat and long bones of rats.
    von See C; Rücker M; Kampmann A; Kokemüller H; Bormann KH; Gellrich NC
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 48(8):607-12. PubMed ID: 19889486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Piezoelectric osteotomy for intraoral harvesting of bone blocks.
    Sohn DS; Ahn MR; Lee WH; Yeo DS; Lim SY
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Apr; 27(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 17514884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of implant drill design on the particle size of the bone collected during osteotomy.
    Park SY; Shin SY; Yang SM; Kye SB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(10):1007-11. PubMed ID: 20566268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of donor characteristics, technique of harvesting and in vitro processing on culturing of human marrow stroma cells for tissue engineered growth of bone.
    Bertram H; Mayer H; Schliephake H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16164457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Viability of maxillary bone harvesting by using different osteotomy techniques. A pilot study.
    Atari M; Chatakun P; Ortiz O; Mañes A; Gil-Recio C; Navarro MF; Garcia-Fernández DA; Caballé-Serrano J; Mareque J; Hernández-Alfaro F; Ferrés Padró E; Giner-Tarrida L
    Histol Histopathol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):1575-83. PubMed ID: 21972096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. A comparative study: piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments.
    Barone A; Santini S; Marconcini S; Giacomelli L; Gherlone E; Covani U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 18371101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Osteogenic potential of autogenous bone grafts harvested with four different surgical techniques.
    Miron RJ; Hedbom E; Saulacic N; Zhang Y; Sculean A; Bosshardt DD; Buser D
    J Dent Res; 2011 Dec; 90(12):1428-33. PubMed ID: 21940523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphology of bone particles after harvesting with 4 different devices.
    Papadimitriou DE; Schmidt EC; Caton JG; Romanos GE
    Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 23344367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cell viability after osteotomy and bone harvesting: comparison of piezoelectric surgery and conventional bur.
    Mouraret S; Houschyar KS; Hunter DJ; Smith AA; Jew OS; Girod S; Helms JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Aug; 43(8):966-71. PubMed ID: 24721169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a piezoelectric surgical device to harvest bone grafts from the mandibular ramus: report of 40 cases.
    Happe A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Jun; 27(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 17694947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel drilling procedure and subsequent bone autograft preparation: a technical note.
    Anitua E; Carda C; Andia I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 17340908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equivalent osteoblastic differentiation function of human mesenchymal stem cells from rheumatoid arthritis in comparison with osteoarthritis.
    Morimoto D; Kuroda S; Kizawa T; Nomura K; Higuchi C; Yoshikawa H; Tomita T
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2009 Jun; 48(6):643-9. PubMed ID: 19398485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guided bone regeneration with the combined use of resorbable membranes and autogenous drilling dust or xenografts for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects around implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Lee SH; Yoon HJ; Park MK; Kim YS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 19216278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of autogenous bone grafts, particulate or collected during osteotomy with implant burs: histologic and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
    Coradazzi LF; Garcia IR; Manfrin TM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 17465344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.