1019 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16104976)
21. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Lohmann D
Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 12190907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modeling capacity of ENDOflash files in simulated root canals.
Fariniuk LF; Baratto-Filho F; Guerisoli DM; Barbizam JV; Pécora JD; Sousa-Neto MD
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11210250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of torque required to fracture three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments around curves of the same angle but of different radius when bound at the tip.
Booth JR; Scheetz JP; Lemons JE; Eleazer PD
J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12540222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Lohmann D
Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 12190908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment.
Schirrmeister JF; Wrbas KT; Schneider FH; Altenburger MJ; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 16545721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Zhang L; Luo HX; Zhou XD; Tan H; Huang DM
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):456-8. PubMed ID: 18358896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.
Kim HC; Kim HJ; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Versluis A
Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):593-602. PubMed ID: 19467053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.
Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L
Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentation of root canals.
Schäfer E; Zapke K
J Endod; 2000 Nov; 26(11):660-4. PubMed ID: 11469296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files.
Sattapan B; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Endod; 2000 Mar; 26(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 11199710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals.
Aydin C; Inan U; Yasar S; Bulucu B; Tunca YM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):e92-7. PubMed ID: 18280956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effectiveness of a manual glide path on the preparation of curved root canals by using Mtwo rotary instruments.
Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
J Endod; 2009 May; 35(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 19410086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):742-7. PubMed ID: 9487850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
