These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16104978)

  • 21. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.
    Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 11203933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors.
    Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison between intraoral indirect and conventional film-based imaging for the detection of dental root fractures: an ex vivo study.
    Shintaku WH; Venturin JS; Noujeim M; Dove SB
    Dent Traumatol; 2013 Dec; 29(6):445-9. PubMed ID: 23566073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
    Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 2082410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient discomfort and retakes in periapical examination of mandibular third molars using digital receptors and film.
    Matzen LH; Christensen J; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):566-72. PubMed ID: 19121963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.
    Parissis N; Angelopoulos C; Mantegari S; Karamanis S; Masood F; Tsirlis A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jan; 11(1):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20098961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [A comparative study of analog and digital intraoral x-ray image detector systems].
    Blendl C; Stengel C; Zdunczyk S
    Rofo; 2000 Jun; 172(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 10916550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system.
    Farrier SL; Drage NA; Newcombe RG; Hayes SJ; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 19548931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Digital radiology using the DIGORA registration technic].
    van der Stelt PF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9289753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Image quality in digital radiographic systems.
    de Almeida SM; de Oliveira AE; Ferreira RI; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 12964659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.