BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16105180)

  • 1. Collection of population-based cancer staging information in Western Australia--a feasibility study.
    Threlfall T; Wittorff J; Boutdara P; Heyworth J; Katris P; Sheiner H; Fritschi L
    Popul Health Metr; 2005 Aug; 3():9. PubMed ID: 16105180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model for collecting colorectal cancer staging information in Western Australia.
    Boutard P; Platell C; Threlfall T
    ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):895-9. PubMed ID: 15456441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Relation of breast cancer tumour stage and the degree of registration in a population-based cancer registry].
    Katalinic A; Holzmann M; Kunze U
    Gesundheitswesen; 2003; 65(8-9):509-15. PubMed ID: 14505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capturing tumour stage in a cancer information database.
    Evans WK; Crook J; Read D; Morriss J; Logan DM
    Cancer Prev Control; 1998 Dec; 2(6):304-9. PubMed ID: 10470461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Retrospective census of cancers between 1994 and 2002 around the municipal solid waste incinerator of Gilly-sur-Isère].
    Thabuis A; Schmitt M; Megas F; Fabres B
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2007 Dec; 55(6):426-32. PubMed ID: 18055149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The National Cancer Data Base report on completeness of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging in United States cancer facilities. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society.
    Fleming ID; Phillips JL; Menck HR
    Cancer; 1996 Oct; 78(7):1498-504. PubMed ID: 8839557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audit of prostate cancer: validity and feasibility of registry-based staging.
    Silcocks P; Needham P; Hemsley F
    Public Health; 1999 Jul; 113(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 10483075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics.
    Jack RH; Linklater KM; Hofman D; Fitzpatrick J; Møller H
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Nov; 6():281. PubMed ID: 17096838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical applications of sentinel lymph-node biopsy for the staging and treatment of solid neoplasms.
    Gipponi M
    Minerva Chir; 2005 Aug; 60(4):217-33. PubMed ID: 16166921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of cancer registry in Phatthalung Hospital.
    Sriplung H; Thongsuksai P; Kuropakornpong V; Kuropakornpong S; Saksornchai C; Wanapantapornkull N
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1997; 28 Suppl 3():11-3. PubMed ID: 9640593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The National Cancer Data Base report on recent hospital cancer program progress toward complete American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM staging.
    Fleming ID; Phillips JL; Menck HR; Murphy GP; Winchester DP
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 80(12):2305-10. PubMed ID: 9404708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ): impact of adequate staging on outcome.
    Barbour AP; Rizk NP; Gonen M; Tang L; Bains MS; Rusch VW; Coit DG; Brennan MF
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):306-16. PubMed ID: 17091329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of collecting colorectal cancer stage information from pathology reports and general practitioners in Queensland.
    Krnjacki LJ; Baade PD; Lynch BM; Aitken JF
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 32(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 18782404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disparities and trends in sentinel lymph node biopsy among early-stage breast cancer patients (1998-2005).
    Chen AY; Halpern MT; Schrag NM; Stewart A; Leitch M; Ward E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):462-74. PubMed ID: 18364506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in women with early breast cancer in Singapore.
    Tan LG; Tan YY; Heng D; Chan MY
    Singapore Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(12):693-7. PubMed ID: 16308642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of uterine cancer staging data using two different staging systems, 2001-2005.
    Duong LM; Ajani UA; Wilson RJ
    J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):125-9. PubMed ID: 20795554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer?
    Marnitz S; Köhler C; Roth C; Füller J; Hinkelbein W; Schneider A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 16126259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computed tomographic screening for lung cancer: the relationship of disease stage to tumor size.
    Henschke CI; Yankelevitz DF; Miettinen OS;
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 166(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 16476872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cancer registry and clinical data as predictors for breast cancer survival.
    Seppänen J; Heinävaara S; Holli K; Hakulinen T
    Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Dec; 19(10):1299-304. PubMed ID: 18752035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can we rely on public data as a source of information for cancer registry in developing countries?
    Semnani S; Kabir MJ; Besharat S; Abdolahi N; Danesh A; Roshandel D
    Turk J Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 16(3):147-9. PubMed ID: 16245225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.