110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16105308)
1. Chlamydia screening in general practice: a missed opportunity?
Ma R
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Jul; 31(3):254-5; author reply 255. PubMed ID: 16105308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of chlamydia screening in a general practice setting: a 6-month pilot study.
Harris DI
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Apr; 31(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15921545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. NICE guidance on one-to-one interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections and under-18 conceptions: a view from general practice.
Oakeshott P; Graham A
Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Apr; 83(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 17435056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HPV vaccine catch up schedule - an opportunity for chlamydia screening.
Grotowski M; May J
Aust Fam Physician; 2008 Jul; 37(7):529-30. PubMed ID: 18592070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.
Macleod J; Salisbury C; Low N; McCarthy A; Sterne JA; Holloway A; Patel R; Sanford E; Morcom A; Horner P; Davey Smith G; Skidmore S; Herring A; Caul O; Hobbs FD; Egger M
BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7497):940. PubMed ID: 15809231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NICE guidance and the National Chlamydia Screening Programme.
Stephenson J
Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Apr; 83(2):170. PubMed ID: 17435055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The National Chlamydia Screening Programme and the NICE guidance on one-to-one interventions: remember the under-25s.
Simms I; Battison T; Macintosh M; Randall S; Clarke J
Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Apr; 83(2):171. PubMed ID: 17435057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for chlamydia: seize the day.
Randall S; LaMontagne DS
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Apr; 31(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 15921540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The Dutch Health Council report on screening for Chlamydia: too reserved].
Dekker JH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(16):850-2. PubMed ID: 15868986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chlamydia screening in primary care.
Oakeshott P; Hay P; Pakianathan M
Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Jul; 54(504):491-3. PubMed ID: 15239908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Chlamydia screening in general practice: views of professionals on the key elements of a successful programme.
Ma R; Clarke A
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Oct; 31(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 16274554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence is not (yet) enough for evidence based policy for chlamydia screening.
ClaSS Study Group
BMJ; 2001 Feb; 322(7282):364-5. PubMed ID: 11229381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sexual behaviour at the millennium.
Oakeshott P; Thomas B
Lancet; 2002 Apr; 359(9316):1520. PubMed ID: 11988272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Commentary: Chlamydia trachomatis screening: what are we trying to do?
Peterman TA; Gottlieb SL; Berman SM
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 38(2):449-51. PubMed ID: 19174542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A paradox: overscreening of older women for Chlamydia while too few younger women are being tested.
Berman SM; Satterwhite CL
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Feb; 38(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 21173722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence and characteristics of rectal chlamydia and gonorrhea cases among men who have sex with men after the introduction of nucleic acid amplification test screening at 2 Canadian sexually transmitted infection clinics.
Gratrix J; Singh AE; Bergman J; Egan C; McGinnis J; Drews SJ; Read R
Sex Transm Dis; 2014 Oct; 41(10):589-91. PubMed ID: 25211252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sexual health in primary care: acceptability of providing a urine sample for chlamydia screening in GP attendees aged 25 or under.
Iles F; Oakeshott P
Fam Pract; 2005 Jun; 22(3):353. PubMed ID: 15772119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying relationships between high-risk sexual behaviors and screening positive for chlamydia and gonorrhea in school-wide screening events.
Salerno J; Darling-Fisher C; Hawkins NM; Fraker E
J Sch Health; 2013 Feb; 83(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 23331269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using patient-provided information to refine sexually transmitted infection screening criteria among women presenting in the emergency department.
Jenkins WD; Kovach R; Wold BJ; Zahnd WE
Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Dec; 39(12):965-7. PubMed ID: 23191951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opportunistic chlamydia screening in a general practice consultation.
Kalwij SA
BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d5108. PubMed ID: 21844158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
