798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16106024)
1. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials.
Shen Y; Yang Y; Inoue LY; Munsell MF; Miller AB; Berry DA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Aug; 97(16):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16106024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Independent prognostic value of screen detection in invasive breast cancer.
Mook S; Van 't Veer LJ; Rutgers EJ; Ravdin PM; van de Velde AO; van Leeuwen FE; Visser O; Schmidt MK
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Apr; 103(7):585-97. PubMed ID: 21350218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mode of detection: an independent prognostic factor for women with breast cancer.
Hofvind S; Holen Å; Román M; Sebuødegård S; Puig-Vives M; Akslen L
J Med Screen; 2016 Jun; 23(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 26582492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods.
Joensuu H; Lehtimäki T; Holli K; Elomaa L; Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T; Kataja V; Anttila A; Lundin M; Isola J; Lundin J
JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(9):1064-73. PubMed ID: 15339900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic screening reduces risk of breast carcinoma recurrence.
Immonen-Räihä P; Kauhava L; Parvinen I; Holli K; Kronqvist P; Pylkkänen L; Helenius H; Kaljonen A; Räsänen O; Klemi PJ
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 15611974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
Autier P; Boniol M
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Favourable prognostic factors of subsequent screen-detected breast cancers among women aged 50-69.
Chiarelli AM; Edwards SA; Sheppard AJ; Mirea L; Chong N; Paszat L; Shumak RS; Oʼmalley FP;
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2012 Nov; 21(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 22273849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection by screening mammography is a powerful independent predictor of survival in women diagnosed with breast cancer.
Gill PG; Farshid G; Luke CG; Roder DM
Breast; 2004 Feb; 13(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 14759711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using tumor phenotype, histological tumor distribution, and mammographic appearance to explain the survival differences between screen-detected and clinically detected breast cancers.
Chuang SL; Chen SL; Yu CP; Chang KJ; Yen AM; Chiu SY; Fann JC; Tabár L; Stephen DW; Smith RA; Chen HH
APMIS; 2014 Aug; 122(8):699-707. PubMed ID: 25046200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tumor size distribution of invasive breast cancers and the sensitivity of screening methods in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Shaevitch D; Taghipour S; Miller AB; Montgomery N; Harvey B
J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(3):562-569. PubMed ID: 28862227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advanced breast cancer and breast cancer mortality in randomized controlled trials on mammography screening.
Autier P; Héry C; Haukka J; Boniol M; Byrnes G
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Dec; 27(35):5919-23. PubMed ID: 19884547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program.
Kirsh VA; Chiarelli AM; Edwards SA; O'Malley FP; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jun; 103(12):942-50. PubMed ID: 21540443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program.
Prummel MV; Done SJ; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Holloway CM; Chiarelli AM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25108740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up?
Taplin SH; Ichikawa L; Yood MU; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Mouchawar J; Leyden WA; Altaras R; Beverly RK; Casso D; Westbrook EO; Bischoff K; Zapka JG; Barlow WE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1518-27. PubMed ID: 15494602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence of invasive breast cancer in the presence of competing mortality: the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Taghipour S; Banjevic D; Fernandes J; Miller AB; Montgomery N; Harvey BJ; Jardine AK
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jul; 134(2):839-51. PubMed ID: 22689090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tumour-related factors and prognosis in breast cancer detected by screening.
Olsson A; Borgquist S; Butt S; Zackrisson S; Landberg G; Manjer J
Br J Surg; 2012 Jan; 99(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 22068957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of mammography screening attendance and detection mode in predicting breast cancer survival-is there added prognostic value?
Biesheuvel C; Czene K; Orgeás CC; Hall P
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 21470933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
