413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16106379)
1. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.
Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW; Taylor RD
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):609-23. PubMed ID: 12910460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.
Wang R; Lu Y; Fang X; Wang S
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2114-25. PubMed ID: 15554682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
Muegge I; Martin YC
J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Information theory-based scoring function for the structure-based prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity.
Kulharia M; Goody RS; Jackson RM
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1990-8. PubMed ID: 18767831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening.
Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):526-34. PubMed ID: 17295466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Watson P; Gillet V; Willett P
J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PMF scoring revisited.
Muegge I
J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5895-902. PubMed ID: 17004705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.
Wang R; Lu Y; Wang S
J Med Chem; 2003 Jun; 46(12):2287-303. PubMed ID: 12773034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes.
Zhang C; Liu S; Zhu Q; Zhou Y
J Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 48(7):2325-35. PubMed ID: 15801826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.
Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 18318474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of binding modes for ligands in the cytochromes P450 and other heme-containing proteins.
Kirton SB; Murray CW; Verdonk ML; Taylor RD
Proteins; 2005 Mar; 58(4):836-44. PubMed ID: 15651036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structural artifacts in protein-ligand X-ray structures: implications for the development of docking scoring functions.
Søndergaard CR; Garrett AE; Carstensen T; Pollastri G; Nielsen JE
J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 52(18):5673-84. PubMed ID: 19711919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]