These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Using ethics to fight bioterrorism. Frankel MS Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5737):1012-7; author reply 1012-7. PubMed ID: 16099963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Adequate regulation, a stop-gap measure, or part of a package? Debates on codes of conduct for scientists could be diverting attention away from more serious questions. Corneliussen F EMBO Rep; 2006 Jul; 7 Spec No(Spec No):S50-4. PubMed ID: 16819451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientist support for biological weapons controls. Alberts B; May RM Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5596):1135. PubMed ID: 12424342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Preventing the hostile use of the life sciences and biotechnologies; fostering a culture of biosecurity and dual use awareness. Conclusions. Sture J; Whitby S Med Confl Surviv; 2012; 28(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 22606764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-year program to discuss voluntary measures to strengthen the biological weapons convention concluded. Grönvall GK; Franco C Biosecur Bioterror; 2006; 4(1):13. PubMed ID: 16602144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An educational imperative: The role of ethical codes and normative prohibitions in CBW-Applicable research. Simon J; Hersh M Minerva; 2002; 40(1):37-55. PubMed ID: 15168663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientists and the history of biological weapons. A brief historical overview of the development of biological weapons in the twentieth century. Guillemin J EMBO Rep; 2006 Jul; 7 Spec No(Spec No):S45-9. PubMed ID: 16819450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]