BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16108087)

  • 1. A theoretical analysis of the selection of differentially expressed genes.
    Mukherjee S; Roberts SJ
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Jun; 3(3):627-43. PubMed ID: 16108087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A theoretical analysis of gene selection.
    Mukherjee S; Roberts SJ
    Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2004; ():131-41. PubMed ID: 16448007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.
    Yu F; Chen MH; Kuo L; Talbott H; Davis JS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():245. PubMed ID: 26250443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments via statistic synthesis.
    Yang YH; Xiao Y; Segal MR
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1084-93. PubMed ID: 15513985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A unified framework for finding differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments.
    Shaik JS; Yeasin M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():347. PubMed ID: 17877806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noise sampling method: an ANOVA approach allowing robust selection of differentially regulated genes measured by DNA microarrays.
    Draghici S; Kulaeva O; Hoff B; Petrov A; Shams S; Tainsky MA
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(11):1348-59. PubMed ID: 12874046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria.
    Chen JJ; Tsai CA; Tzeng S; Chen CH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8():74. PubMed ID: 17338815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies.
    Shi L; Jones WD; Jensen RV; Harris SC; Perkins RG; Goodsaid FM; Guo L; Croner LJ; Boysen C; Fang H; Qian F; Amur S; Bao W; Barbacioru CC; Bertholet V; Cao XM; Chu TM; Collins PJ; Fan XH; Frueh FW; Fuscoe JC; Guo X; Han J; Herman D; Hong H; Kawasaki ES; Li QZ; Luo Y; Ma Y; Mei N; Peterson RL; Puri RK; Shippy R; Su Z; Sun YA; Sun H; Thorn B; Turpaz Y; Wang C; Wang SJ; Warrington JA; Willey JC; Wu J; Xie Q; Zhang L; Zhang L; Zhong S; Wolfinger RD; Tong W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 9 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S10. PubMed ID: 18793455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mixture model approach to sample size estimation in two-sample comparative microarray experiments.
    Jørstad TS; Midelfart H; Bones AM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():117. PubMed ID: 18298817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
    Jung SH
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size calculations based on ranking and selection in microarray experiments.
    Matsui S; Zeng S; Yamanaka T; Shaughnessy J
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 17680829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ranking analysis of F-statistics for microarray data.
    Tan YD; Fornage M; Xu H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 9():142. PubMed ID: 18325100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A spline function approach for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
    He W
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(17):2954-63. PubMed ID: 15180936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An integrated algorithm for gene selection and classification applied to microarray data of ovarian cancer.
    Lee ZJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Jan; 42(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 18006289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multivariate approach for selecting sets of differentially expressed genes.
    Chilingaryan A; Gevorgyan N; Vardanyan A; Jones D; Szabo A
    Math Biosci; 2002 Mar; 176(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 11867084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Global Error Assessment (GEA) model for the selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data.
    Mansourian R; Mutch DM; Antille N; Aubert J; Fogel P; Le Goff JM; Moulin J; Petrov A; Rytz A; Voegel JJ; Roberts MA
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2726-37. PubMed ID: 15145801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A bootstrap test for the analysis of microarray experiments with a very small number of replications.
    Neuhäuser M; Jöckel KH
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2006; 5(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 16922598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A powerful approach for effective finding of significantly differentially expressed genes.
    Abul O; Alhajj R; Polat F
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2006; 3(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 17048460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ranking analysis for identifying differentially expressed genes.
    Qi Y; Sun H; Sun Q; Pan L
    Genomics; 2011 May; 97(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 21402142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.