These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16108880)
1. How has the 'two-week wait' rule affected the presentation of colorectal cancer? Chohan DP; Goodwin K; Wilkinson S; Miller R; Hall NR Colorectal Dis; 2005 Sep; 7(5):450-3. PubMed ID: 16108880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effectiveness of the '2-week wait' referral service for colorectal cancer. Leung E; Grainger J; Bandla N; Wong L Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1671-4. PubMed ID: 20946272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The association between referral source and outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. Schneider C; Bevis PM; Durdey P; Thomas MG; Sylvester PA; Longman RJ Surgeon; 2013 Jun; 11(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23238513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction in the proportion of patients with colorectal cancer presenting as an emergency following the introduction of fast-track flexible sigmoidoscopy: a three-year prospective observational study. Davies RJ; Collins CD; Vickery CJ; Eyre-Brook I; Welbourn R Colorectal Dis; 2004 Jul; 6(4):265-7. PubMed ID: 15206971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic value of CEA and CA 19-9 serum levels in colorectal cancer. Reiter W; Stieber P; Reuter C; Nagel D; Lau-Werner U; Lamerz R Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(6D):5195-8. PubMed ID: 11326694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The association between referral source and stage of disease in patients with colorectal cancer. Bevis PM; Donaldson OW; Card M; Durdey P; Thomas MG; Sylvester PA; Longman RJ Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jan; 10(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 17477850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A study on the routes of referral for patients with colorectal cancer and its affect on the time to surgery and pathological stage. Trickett JP; Donaldson DR; Bearn PE; Scott HJ; Hassall AC Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 15521930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changing trends in the management of colorectal cancers and its impact on cancer waiting times. Raje D; La Touche S; Mukhtar H; Oshowo A; Ingham Clark C Colorectal Dis; 2006 Feb; 8(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16412075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Audit of referrals for head and neck cancer - the effect of the 2-week, fast track referral system. Lyons M; Philpott J; Hore I; Watters G Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2004 Apr; 29(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 15113298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Department of Health's "two week standard" for bowel cancer: is it working? Flashman K; O'Leary DP; Senapati A; Thompson MR Gut; 2004 Mar; 53(3):387-91. PubMed ID: 14960522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screen-detected colorectal cancers show improved cancer-specific survival when compared with cancers diagnosed via the 2-week suspected colorectal cancer referral guidelines. Courtney ED; Chong D; Tighe R; Easterbrook JR; Stebbings WS; Hernon J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Feb; 15(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 22709315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A single common urgent pathway for all colorectal referrals reduces time to diagnosis and treatment. Scott MA; Knight A; Brown K; Novell JR Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 17032322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes in 2748 patients referred to a colorectal two-week rule clinic. Smith RA; Oshin O; McCallum J; Randles J; Kennedy S; Delamere S; Rooney PS; Carter PS Colorectal Dis; 2007 May; 9(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 17432987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes' stage B disease. Evans MD; Barton K; Rees A; Stamatakis JD; Karandikar SS Colorectal Dis; 2008 Feb; 10(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 17477849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Different distribution of Dukes' stage between proximal and distal colorectal cancer. Ikeda Y; Akagi K; Kinoshita J; Abe T; Miyazaki M; Mori M; Sugimachi K Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(48):1535-7. PubMed ID: 12397728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Colorectal cancer--a prospective evaluation of symptom duration and GP referral patterns in an inner city teaching hospital. Khattak I; Eardley NJ; Rooney PS Colorectal Dis; 2006 Jul; 8(6):518-21. PubMed ID: 16784474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Referral of suspected colorectal cancer: have guidelines made a difference? Jiwa M; Hamilton W Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Aug; 54(505):608-10. PubMed ID: 15296561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urgency of referral and its impact on outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. Ramsay G; MacKay C; Nanthakumaran S; Craig WL; McAdam TK; Loudon MA Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jul; 14(7):e375-7. PubMed ID: 22284530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast-track barium enema: meeting the two-week wait rule for patients with suspected colorectal cancer. Glancy DG; Card M; Sylvester PA; Thomas MG; Durdey P; Callaway M; Virjee J Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 15859961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Has the 'Fast-Track' referral system affected the route of presentation and/or clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer? Thornton L; Reader H; Stojkovic S; Allgar V; Woodcock N World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 14(1):158. PubMed ID: 27278651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]