These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16109241)

  • 1. [Measures for the performance of diagnostic tests].
    Rud B; Matzen P; Hilden J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Aug; 167(33):3018-22. PubMed ID: 16109241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can nurses appropriately interpret the Ottawa Ankle Rule?
    Derksen RJ; Bakker FC; Termaat MF; Patka P; Haarman HJ; de Lange-de Klerk ES
    Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Mar; 23(2):201-3;. PubMed ID: 15765347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic performance of the Bernese versus Ottawa ankle rules: Results of a randomised controlled trial.
    Derksen RJ; Knijnenberg LM; Fransen G; Breederveld RS; Heymans MW; Schipper IB
    Injury; 2015 Aug; 46(8):1645-9. PubMed ID: 25933807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury.
    Sman AD; Hiller CE; Rae K; Linklater J; Black DA; Nicholson LL; Burns J; Refshauge KM
    Br J Sports Med; 2015 Mar; 49(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 24255766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failed validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injury.
    Kelly AM; Richards D; Kerr L; Grant J; O'Donovan P; Basire K; Graham R
    N Z Med J; 1994 Jul; 107(982):294-5. PubMed ID: 8093158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can patients apply the Ottawa ankle rules to themselves?
    Blackham JE; Claridge T; Benger JR
    Emerg Med J; 2008 Nov; 25(11):750-1. PubMed ID: 18955612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in the interpretation of Ottawa ankle and foot rules by specialized emergency nurses.
    Derksen RJ; Bakker FC; Geervliet PC; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Heilbron EA; Veenings B; Patka P; Haarman HJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 23(6):725-9. PubMed ID: 16182978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.
    Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM
    CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beauty is in the eye of the examiner: reaching agreement about physical signs and their value.
    Joshua AM; Celermajer DS; Stockler MR
    Intern Med J; 2005 Mar; 35(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 15737139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Fewer X-rays, while maintaining quality of care using clinical protocols for physical diagnosis of ankle injuries].
    van Harten PN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jul; 144(30):1459-60. PubMed ID: 10932701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa Ankle and Midfoot Rules: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Beckenkamp PR; Lin CC; Macaskill P; Michaleff ZA; Maher CG; Moseley AM
    Br J Sports Med; 2017 Mar; 51(6):504-510. PubMed ID: 27884861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Ottawa ankle rules and current local guidelines for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
    Keogh SP; Shafi A; Wijetunge DB
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Oct; 43(5):341-3. PubMed ID: 9803109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ottawa ankle rules for the injured ankle.
    Heyworth J
    BMJ; 2003 Feb; 326(7386):405-6. PubMed ID: 12595349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of a clinical examination to predict need for radiography in children with ankle injuries: a prospective study.
    Boutis K; Komar L; Jaramillo D; Babyn P; Alman B; Snyder B; Mandl KD; Schuh S
    Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2118-21. PubMed ID: 11784626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Fewer x-rays while maintaining quality of clinical care using clinical protocols for physical diagnosis of ankle injuries].
    van Riet YE; van der Schouw YT; van der Werken C
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(5):224-8. PubMed ID: 10682650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The two-step Fagan's nomogram: ad hoc interpretation of a diagnostic test result without calculation.
    Caraguel CG; Vanderstichel R
    Evid Based Med; 2013 Aug; 18(4):125-8. PubMed ID: 23468201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of instrumented and manual talar tilt tests in chronic ankle instability populations.
    Rosen AB; Ko J; Brown CN
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2015 Apr; 25(2):e214-21. PubMed ID: 24995627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Fewer X-rays, while maintaining quality of care using clinical protocols for physical diagnosis of ankle injuries].
    Knol A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jul; 144(30):1459; author reply 1460. PubMed ID: 10932699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are you reading what we are reading? The effect of who interprets medical images on estimates of diagnostic test accuracy in systematic reviews.
    Brealey S; Westwood M
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Aug; 80(956):674-7. PubMed ID: 17762057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.