These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Xeroradiography and ionography: new technologies to replace the x-ray film. Allan FV; Reiss KH Med Prog Technol; 1976 Apr; 3(4):143-8. PubMed ID: 934037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Phantom evaluation of the effect of film processing on mammographic screen-film combinations. McLean D; Rickard MT Australas Radiol; 1994 Aug; 38(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 7945109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Detail recognition in the x-ray picture and the limits of possible reduction in radiation dosage]. Gurwitsch AM Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):444-7. PubMed ID: 2834794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Examination technique, image quality, and patient dose in paediatric radiology. A survey including 19 Swedish hospitals. Almén A; Lööf M; Mattsson S Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):337-42. PubMed ID: 8845265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relative doses in mammography: the future development of film/screen mammography systems. Kitts EL; Beutel J; Holland RS; Blank B Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():1-9. PubMed ID: 2236846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. An investigation of X-ray equipment factors influencing patient dose in radiography. Williams JR; Catling MK Br J Radiol; 1998 Nov; 71(851):1192-8. PubMed ID: 10434915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reduction of patient dose in medical radiography by utilizing scattered X-rays: relation between permissible limit of scatter fraction, viewer brightness, and perceptibility of vision. Asai Y; Uemura M; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H Phys Med; 2010 Oct; 26(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 20133175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dose reduction in the low-energy X-ray diagnostics of extremities. Zaránd P; Pálvölgyi R; Péntek Z; Polgár I Acta Biochim Biophys Acad Sci Hung; 1981; 16(3-4):219-22. PubMed ID: 7347990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: task dependent optimization for screen-film imaging. Sandborg M; Dance DR; Carlsson GA; Persliden J Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):76-85. PubMed ID: 8298879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality control in diagnostic radiology--a United States perspective. Thiele DL Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Jun; 19(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 8826715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Luminescent screens for general X-ray diagnostics. Blinov NN; Valeyev AS; Gorelik FG; Reznik KA Med Prog Technol; 1992; 18(1-2):85-90. PubMed ID: 1388239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Image information content and patient exposure. Motz JW; Danos M Med Phys; 1978; 5(1):8-22. PubMed ID: 634242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Acceptance and constancy test radiographic projections with screen film systems]. Blendl C Z Med Phys; 2002; 12(4):268-80. PubMed ID: 12575441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Permissible doses of radiation for patients undergoing x-ray studies]. Sobol' IS Med Radiol (Mosk); 1975 Feb; 20(2):39-43. PubMed ID: 1134230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Scoliosis studies with low-dose X-rays]. van der Walt MJ; Grobler LJ; Savage DJ; Hartkamp A S Afr Med J; 1985 Apr; 67(14):547-9. PubMed ID: 3992381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]