BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16109289)

  • 1. Sex differentiated responses to intranasal trigeminal stimuli.
    Lundström JN; Frasnelli J; Larsson M; Hummel T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Sep; 57(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 16109289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex-specific hemispheric differences in cortical activation to a bimodal odor.
    Lundström JN; Hummel T
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 166(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 16183142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration.
    Stuck BA; Frey S; Freiburg C; Hörmann K; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1367-75. PubMed ID: 16651024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Topographical differences in the trigeminal sensitivity of the human nasal mucosa.
    Scheibe M; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Neuroreport; 2006 Sep; 17(13):1417-20. PubMed ID: 16932150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-course of trigeminal versus olfactory stimulation: evidence from chemosensory evoked potentials.
    Flohr EL; Boesveldt S; Haehner A; Iannilli E; Sinding C; Hummel T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 25697131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Olfactory and chemosomatosensory function in pregnant women assessed with event-related potentials.
    Olofsson JK; Broman DA; Wulff M; Martinkauppi M; Nordin S
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Sep; 86(1-2):252-7. PubMed ID: 16112693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Co-stimulation with an olfactory stimulus increases arousal responses to trigeminal stimulation.
    Stuck BA; Baja J; Lenz F; Herr RM; Heiser C
    Neuroscience; 2011 Mar; 176():442-6. PubMed ID: 21223995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pupillary responses to intranasal trigeminal and olfactory stimulation.
    Schneider CB; Ziemssen T; Schuster B; Seo HS; Haehner A; Hummel T
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2009 Jul; 116(7):885-9. PubMed ID: 19484181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Topographical differences in the sensitivity of the human nasal mucosa to olfactory and trigeminal stimuli.
    Ishimaru T; Reden J; Krone F; Scheibe M
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Apr; 493(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 21334419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of short inter-stimulus intervals on olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials.
    Kassab A; Schaub F; Vent J; Hüttenbrink KB; Damm M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1250-6. PubMed ID: 19863320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are there sex-related differences in responses to repetitive olfactory/trigeminal stimuli?
    Scheibe M; Opatz O; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Aug; 266(8):1323-6. PubMed ID: 19002476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chemosensory attention, habituation and detection in women and men.
    Andersson L; Lundberg C; Aström J; Nordin S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):316-22. PubMed ID: 21129421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The neural representation of odor is modulated by the presence of a trigeminal stimulus during odor encoding.
    Bensafi M; Frasnelli J; Reden J; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):696-701. PubMed ID: 17208517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3-Methylindole alters both olfactory and trigeminal nasal mucosal potentials in rats.
    Kratskin I; Hummel T; Hastings L; Doty R
    Neuroreport; 2000 Jul; 11(10):2195-7. PubMed ID: 10923669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems.
    Livermore A; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jan; 29(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 14752039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chemosensory event-related brain potentials (CSERP) after strictly monorhinal stimulation.
    Gudziol H; Fischer J; Bitter T; Guntinas-Lichius O
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Sep; 93(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 24952214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Event-related brain potentials to attended and ignored olfactory and trigeminal stimuli.
    Geisler MW; Murphy C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2000 Sep; 37(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 10858576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal-to-noise ratio of chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Boesveldt S; Haehner A; Berendse HW; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):690-5. PubMed ID: 17188566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lateralisation of intranasal trigeminal chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Rombaux P; Guérit JM; Mouraux A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2008 Feb; 38(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18329547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-frequency analysis of chemosensory event-related potentials to characterize the cortical representation of odors in humans.
    Huart C; Legrain V; Hummel T; Rombaux P; Mouraux A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33221. PubMed ID: 22427997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.