179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1610929)
1. [Tolerability of nonionic contrast media--results of a multicenter double blind study].
Schmiedel E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 May; 2(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 1610929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Are nonionic contrast media identical in their tolerability? Results of a double-blind randomized multicenter study with iomeprol and iopromide].
Schmiedel E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 9340014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Undesirable side effects of contrast media during i.v. DSA--a comparison of 2 nonionic contrast media].
Gross-Fengels W; Neufang KF; Siebert C; Lanfermann H; Steinbrich W
Rontgenblatter; 1990 Apr; 43(4):144-9. PubMed ID: 2187230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography.
Mützel W; Langer M; Keysser R
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():101-4. PubMed ID: 2568774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative study of iohexol and iopamidol as cardioangiographic contrast media].
Esplugas E; Jara F; Sala J; Cequier A
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990 Feb; 43(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 2326538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A double-blind study of iopromide 300 for peripheral arteriography. Results of a multi-institutional comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol.
Druy EM; Bettmann MA; Jeans W
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S102-5; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography.
Faykus MH; Cope C; Athanasoulis C; Druy EM; Hedgcock M; Miller FJ; Bron K
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S98-101; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Iopromide, a new contrast medium for angiography. Clinical study and comparison with other low-osmolar contrast media].
Steidle B; Wolf KJ; Banzer D; Seyferath W
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1984 Aug; 109(34):1275-8. PubMed ID: 6381018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, randomized trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iobitridol 350 (Xenetix) in cardiac catheterization.
Vijayalakshmi K; Williams D; Wright RA; Hall JA; Harcombe AA; Linker NJ; Stewart MJ; Davies A; de Belder MA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 16(12):707-11. PubMed ID: 15596875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol in coronary arteriography and left ventriculography.
Bergelson B; Bettmann MA; Wexler L; Wilson R; Dyet J
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S107-11; discussion S118-9. PubMed ID: 8071037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast media and nephropathy: findings from systematic analysis and Food and Drug Administration reports of adverse effects.
Solomon R; Dumouchel W
Invest Radiol; 2006 Aug; 41(8):651-60. PubMed ID: 16829749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomised controlled trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iomeprol 350 (Iomeron) in cardiac catheterisation.
Vijayalakshmi K; Kunadian B; Wright RA; Hall JA; Stewart MJ; Davies A; Sutton A; de Belder MA
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):342-50. PubMed ID: 17101256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Delayed vs. immediate adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast media.
Oi H; Yamazaki H; Matsushita M
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9134581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Late reactions to a radiologic contrast media (Iopamidol-Bracco). Prospective study].
Bartolucci F; Cecarini M; Gabrielli G; Abbiati R; Barberio M; Busilacchi P
Radiol Med; 2000 Oct; 100(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 11155455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative evaluation of 2 non-ionic contrast media, iopentol (350 mgI/ml) and iopamidol (370 mgI/ml) in coronary angiography].
Maddestra N; Di Cesare A; Salute L; Toppetti A; Minguzzi P; Marelli C; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 7997610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osmolality of nonionic contrast media.
Miklautz H; Fichte K; Wegscheider K
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():16-20. PubMed ID: 2568786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variable effects of radiological contrast media on thrombus growth in a rabbit jugular vein thrombosis model.
Levi M; Biemond BJ; Sturk A; Hoek J; ten Cate JW
Thromb Haemost; 1991 Aug; 66(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 1771615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
