BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16110292)

  • 1. Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.
    Nagashima T; Hashimoto H; Oshida K; Nakano S; Tanabe N; Nikaido T; Koda K; Miyazaki M
    Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16110292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
    Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
    Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study.
    Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Vo TT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):1007-15. PubMed ID: 11906892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy.
    Cheung YC; Wan YL; Chen SC; Lui KW; Ng SH; Yeow KM; Lee KF; Hsueh S
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2002; 30(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 12116093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
    Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications.
    Gufler H; Buitrago-Téllez CH; Madjar H; Allmann KH; Uhl M; Rohr-Reyes A
    Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 10866074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
    Holland R; Hendriks JH
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications.
    Moon WK; Im JG; Koh YH; Noh DY; Park IA
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 11110953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast US in patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy on screening mammography.
    Kang SS; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Aug; 67(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 17703906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.
    Stehouwer BL; Merckel LG; Verkooijen HM; Peters NH; Mann RM; Duvivier KM; Mali WP; Peeters PH; Veldhuis WB; van den Bosch MA
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonographic findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Lee MH; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH; Ko ES; Hahn SY
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Oct; 41(8):465-71. PubMed ID: 23949917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
    Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.
    Londero V; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Nori J; Bazzocchi M
    Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):863-76. PubMed ID: 17891529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study.
    Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY
    BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indications for stereotactically-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for patients with category 3 microcalcifications.
    Kikuchi M; Tsunoda-Shimizu H; Kawasaki T; Suzuki K; Nakamura S; Yagata H; Tsugawa K; Takahashi O
    Breast Cancer; 2007; 14(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 17690506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Outcomes According to Image-Guided Biopsy Method.
    Bae S; Yoon JH; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(5):996-1005. PubMed ID: 26357494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS.
    Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases.
    Farshid G; Sullivan T; Downey P; Gill PG; Pieterse S
    Br J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 105(11):1669-75. PubMed ID: 22052156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.