279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16110292)
21. What is the predictor for invasion in non-palpable breast cancer with microcalcifications?
Nishimura S; Takahashi K; Gomi N; Tada K; Makita M; Tada T; Iwase T; Yoshimoto M; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G; Kasumi F
Breast Cancer; 2004; 11(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 14718793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Retrieval rate and accuracy of ultrasound-guided 14-G semi-automated core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Yi J; Lee EH; Kwak JJ; Cha JG; Jung SH
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24497787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography.
Rinaldi P; Buccheri C; Giuliani M; Bufi E; Romani M; Patrolecco F; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 27618803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast MRI as a Problem-solving Study in the Evaluation of BI-RADS Categories 3 and 4 Microcalcifications: Is it Worth Performing?
Shimauchi A; Machida Y; Maeda I; Fukuma E; Hoshi K; Tozaki M
Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):288-296. PubMed ID: 29191685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mammographic pattern of microcalcifications in the preoperative diagnosis of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathologic correlation.
Hermann G; Keller RJ; Drossman S; Caravella BA; Tartter P; Panetta RA; Bleiweiss IJ
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Aug; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 10459309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Radiologic-histopathologic correlation of microcalcifications from 11g vacuum biopsy: analysis of 3196 core biopsies].
Fischmann A; Pietsch-Breitfeld B; Müller-Schimpfle M; Siegmann K; Wersebe A; Rothenberger-Janzen K; Claussen CD; Janzen J
Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 15088178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings.
Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Rosenblatt R
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 10478253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Microcalcifications associated with in situ ductal breast carcinoma. Mammographic and histological correlations with morphometric evaluation].
Negri S; Capitanio A; Pegorari E; Azzolini D; Sardo P
Pathologica; 1999 Jun; 91(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 10536463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Histological correlation of mammographically detected microcalcifications in stereotactic core biopsies.
Dahlstrom JE; Jain S
Pathology; 2001 Nov; 33(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 11827410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Gwak YJ; Kim HJ; Kwak JY; Lee SK; Shin KM; Lee HJ; Kim GC; Jang YJ; Han MH; Park JY; Jung JH
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 21498298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Imaging and pathologic features of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: can sonography predict upgrade?
Komarla R; Gilliland L; Piraner M; Seidel R; Clifford K; Kunjummen J
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211013. PubMed ID: 34870448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer associated with isolated clustered microcalcifications, mammographically identified.
Ranieri E; D'Andrea MR; D'Alessio A; Bergomi S; Caprio G; Calabrese GB; Virno F
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(4A):2831-5. PubMed ID: 9252725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Occurrence and positive predictive value of additional nonmass findings for risk stratification of breast microcalcifications in mammography.
Rominger MB; Sax EV; Figiel JH; Timmesfeld N
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2013 Nov; 64(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 23298860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?
Bitencourt AG; Lima EN; Macedo BR; Conrado JL; Marques EF; Chojniak R
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1893-1900. PubMed ID: 27585658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiologic-pathological correlation of punctate hyperechoic foci by ultrasound in stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy samples.
Okazaki H; Tsujimoto F; Maeda I; Ohta T; Kanemaki Y; Okamoto K; Shimamoto H; Yabuki Y; Ogata H; Ohta T; Fukuda M; Nakajima Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 27(10):438-43. PubMed ID: 20035416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clustered microcalcifications of intermediate concern detected on digital mammography: ultrasound assessment.
Yu PC; Lee YW; Chou FF; Wu SC; Huang CC; Ng SH; Sheen-Chen SM; Ko SF
Breast; 2011 Dec; 20(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 21723728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Mammography and Ultrasonography for Tumor Size of DCIS of Breast Cancer.
Wang Y; Wang J; Wang H; Yang X; Chang L; Li Q
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(2):209-213. PubMed ID: 31975667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients.
Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Khetani K; Abdullah N; Joseph L; Kao E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Jun; 64(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 19414087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
