These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16110710)
21. Health Technology Assessment of Public Health Interventions Published 2012 to 2016: An Analysis of Characteristics and Comparison of Methods. Polus S; Mathes T; Klingler C; Messer M; Gerhardus A; Stegbauer C; Willms G; Ehrenreich H; Marckmann G; Pieper D Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019; 35(4):280-290. PubMed ID: 31337450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Guidance for considering ethical, legal, and social issues in health technology assessment: application to genetic screening. Potter BK; Avard D; Graham ID; Entwistle VA; Caulfield TA; Chakraborty P; Kennedy C; McGuire M; Griener GG; Montgomery M; Wells GA; Wilson BJ Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):412-22. PubMed ID: 18828935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. What Is Next for Patient Preferences in Health Technology Assessment? A Systematic Review of the Challenges. Huls SPI; Whichello CL; van Exel J; Uyl-de Groot CA; de Bekker-Grob EW Value Health; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1318-1328. PubMed ID: 31708070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Health technology assessment of public health interventions: an analysis of characteristics and comparison of methods-study protocol. Mathes T; Willms G; Polus S; Stegbauer C; Messer M; Klingler C; Ehrenreich H; Niebuhr D; Marckmann G; Gerhardus A; Pieper D Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):79. PubMed ID: 29792224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of ethical analysis in conducting a health technology assessment of medical treatments for gender dysphoria. Saarni SI; Uusitalo S; Autti-Rämö I Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Nov; 38(1):e82. PubMed ID: 36373501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF COMPLEX TECHNOLOGIES: INTEGRATING VARIOUS ASPECTS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT. Lysdahl KB; Mozygemba K; Burns J; Brönneke JB; Chilcott JB; Ward S; Hofmann B Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(5):570-576. PubMed ID: 28780928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Different methods for ethical analysis in health technology assessment: an empirical study. Saarni SI; Braunack-Mayer A; Hofmann B; van der Wilt GJ Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 22004770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Core competencies for ethics experts in health technology assessment. Refolo P; Bond K; Bloemen B; Autti-Rämö I; Hofmann B; Mischke C; Mueller D; Nabukenya S; Oortwijn W; Sandman L; Stanak M; Steele D; van der Wilt GJ; Sacchini D Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Dec; 36(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 33292881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Health technology assessment: principles, methods and current status. Giovagnoni A; Bartolucci L; Manna A; Morbiducci J; Ascoli G Radiol Med; 2009 Aug; 114(5):673-91. PubMed ID: 19367465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Why not integrate ethics in HTA: identification and assessment of the reasons. Hofmann B GMS Health Technol Assess; 2014; 10():Doc04. PubMed ID: 25493101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. "Same same but different"? On the questionable but crucial differentiation between ethical and social aspects in health technology assessment. Otto I; Kahrass H; Mertz M Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2021 Aug; 164():1-10. PubMed ID: 34301527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. From applied ethics to empirical ethics to contextual ethics. Hoffmaster B Bioethics; 2018 Feb; 32(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 29280167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ethical Challenges Related to Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment. Vanstone M; Abelson J; Bidonde J; Bond K; Burgess R; Canfield C; Schwartz L; Tripp L Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019; 35(4):253-256. PubMed ID: 31250778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment. Draborg E; Gyrd-Hansen D; Poulsen PB; Horder M Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15736519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Revealing and acknowledging value judgments in health technology assessment. Hofmann B; Cleemput I; Bond K; Krones T; Droste S; Sacchini D; Oortwijn W Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Dec; 30(6):579-86. PubMed ID: 25816823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The evolution of public health ethics frameworks: systematic review of moral values and norms in public health policy. Abbasi M; Majdzadeh R; Zali A; Karimi A; Akrami F Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Sep; 21(3):387-402. PubMed ID: 29124449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Framework for systematic identification of ethical aspects of healthcare technologies: the SBU approach. Heintz E; Lintamo L; Hultcrantz M; Jacobson S; Levi R; Munthe C; Tranæus S; Östlund P; Sandman L Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 26134927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Current state of ethics literature synthesis: a systematic review of reviews. Mertz M; Kahrass H; Strech D BMC Med; 2016 Oct; 14(1):152. PubMed ID: 27716264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]