These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16110714)

  • 1. Impact of uncertainty on cost-effectiveness analysis of medical strategies: the case of high-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer patients.
    Marino P; Siani C; Roché H; Moatti JP;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(3):342-50. PubMed ID: 16110714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can sequential administration minimise the cost of high dose chemotherapy? An economic assessment in inflammatory breast cancer.
    Marino P; Le Corroller AG; Palangié T; Janvier M; Fabbro M; Molinier L; Delozier T; Livartowski A; Moatti JP; Viens P;
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(11):807-18. PubMed ID: 12859221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant treatment for early node-positive breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
    Wolowacz SE; Cameron DA; Tate HC; Bagust A
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Feb; 26(6):925-33. PubMed ID: 18281666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phase I/II trial of human recombinant granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) and escalating doses of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-FU in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.
    Budd GT; Atiba J; Silver RT; Palmer G; Armstrong S; Otto K; Presant C
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1999; 125(8-9):500-4. PubMed ID: 10480343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study.
    Therasse P; Mauriac L; Welnicka-Jaskiewicz M; Bruning P; Cufer T; Bonnefoi H; Tomiak E; Pritchard KI; Hamilton A; Piccart MJ;
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Mar; 21(5):843-50. PubMed ID: 12610183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic evaluation of intensive chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with high-risk early breast cancer in Japan.
    Ishiguro H; Kondo M; Hoshi SL; Takada M; Nakamura S; Teramukai S; Yanagihara K; Toi M
    Clin Ther; 2010 Feb; 32(2):311-26. PubMed ID: 20206789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
    Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: 5-year results of a randomized trial comparing conventional doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with high-dose mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide with filgrastim in operable breast cancer with 10 or more involved axillary nodes.
    Fumoleau P; Chauvin F; Namer M; Bugat R; Tubiana-Hulin M; Guastalla JP; Delozier T; Kerbrat P; Devaux Y; Bonneterre J; Filleul A; Clavel M
    J Clin Oncol; 2001 Feb; 19(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 11157010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer.
    Messori A; Becagli P; Trippoli S; Tendi E
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1996; 51(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 8911873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving FEC-D.
    Lee EK; Wong WW; Trudeau ME; Chan KK
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Feb; 150(1):169-80. PubMed ID: 25694355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A phase II study of a dose-density regimen with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide on days 1 and 4 every 14 days with filgrastim support followed by weekly paclitaxel in women with primary breast cancer.
    Pietri E; Andreis D; Fabbri F; Menna C; Schirone A; Kopf B; Rocca A; Amadori D; De Giorgi U
    Oncologist; 2015 Mar; 20(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 25637379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant therapy for node positive breast cancer in Korea: docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC).
    Lee SG; Jee YG; Chung HC; Kim SB; Ro J; Im YH; Im SA; Seo JH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Apr; 114(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 18437555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health-related quality of life in survivors of locally advanced breast cancer: an international randomised controlled phase III trial.
    Bottomley A; Therasse P; Piccart M; Efficace F; Coens C; Gotay C; Welnicka-Jaskiewicz M; Mauriac L; Dyczka J; Cufer T; Lichinitser MR; Schornagel JH; Bonnefoi H; Shepherd L; ; ;
    Lancet Oncol; 2005 May; 6(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 15863376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inflammatory breast cancer outcome with epirubicin-based induction and maintenance chemotherapy: ten-year results from the French Adjuvant Study Group GETIS 02 Trial.
    Veyret C; Levy C; Chollet P; Merrouche Y; Roche H; Kerbrat P; Fumoleau P; Fargeot P; Clavere P; Chevallier B
    Cancer; 2006 Dec; 107(11):2535-44. PubMed ID: 17054108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term efficacy and toxicity of the FEC100 regimen.
    Bonneterre JM;
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2004 Dec; 18(14 Suppl 14):56-8. PubMed ID: 15685837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmaco-economic study of intensive chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell support for advanced breast cancer.
    Pinguet F; Savelli K; Petit I; Gerbi-Benmansour Y; Fabbro M
    Oncol Rep; 2001; 8(5):1013-7. PubMed ID: 11496307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conventional adjuvant chemotherapy versus single-cycle, autograft-supported, high-dose, late-intensification chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: a randomized trial.
    Leonard RC; Lind M; Twelves C; Coleman R; van Belle S; Wilson C; Ledermann J; Kennedy I; Barrett-Lee P; Perren T; Verrill M; Cameron D; Foster E; Yellowlees A; Crown J;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Jul; 96(14):1076-83. PubMed ID: 15265969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phase I trial of high-dose mitoxantrone plus cyclophosphamide and filgrastim in patients with advanced breast carcinoma.
    Sparano JA; Robert N; Silverman P; Lazarus H; Malik U; Venkatraj U; Sarta C
    J Clin Oncol; 1996 Sep; 14(9):2576-83. PubMed ID: 8823338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
    Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.