139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16111059)
1. Peer review in action: the contribution of referees to advancing reliable knowledge.
Hanks G
Palliat Med; 2005 Jul; 19(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 16111059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
Downer M
Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12688596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review: should we modify our process?
Berquist TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The peer review process (aka peer reviewology).
Yucha CB
Biol Res Nurs; 2002 Oct; 4(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 12408212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
Jefferson T; Shashok K
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Blinded by the light: Anonymization should be used in peer review to prevent bias, not protect referees.
Shaw DM
EMBO Rep; 2015 Aug; 16(8):894-7. PubMed ID: 26174615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Some reflections on peer review.
Elwood TW
J Allied Health; 2014; 43(1):1. PubMed ID: 24598893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings.
DeCoursey TE
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. To publish or perish: how to review a manuscript.
Winck JC; Fonseca JA; Azevedo LF; Wedzicha JA
Rev Port Pneumol; 2011; 17(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 21477574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An open letter to WJNR reviewers.
Brink PJ
West J Nurs Res; 2003 Apr; 25(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 12705110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Why your manuscript was rejected and how to prevent it.
Dogra S
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2011; 77(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 21393939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Standards for papers on cloning.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):243. PubMed ID: 16421524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?
Pravinkumar E
Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9385):747. PubMed ID: 12957106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Referees should exercise their rights.
Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7719):409. PubMed ID: 30131542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Editorial.
Weisse T
Eur J Protistol; 2015 Apr; 51(2):A1-2. PubMed ID: 26008765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Civil, sensible, and constructive peer review in APS journals.
Raff H; Brown D
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2013 Aug; 305(3):G205-6. PubMed ID: 23703653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
