These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16112462)

  • 1. Matching IMRT fields with static photon field in the treatment of head-and-neck cancer.
    Li JG; Liu C; Kim S; Amdur RJ; Palta JR
    Med Dosim; 2005; 30(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 16112462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A dynamic supraclavicular field-matching technique for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT.
    Duan J; Shen S; Spencer SA; Ahmed RS; Popple RA; Ye SJ; Brezovich IA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):959-72. PubMed ID: 15465215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetric assessment of the field abutment region in head and neck treatments using a multileaf collimator.
    Abdel-Hakim K; Nishimura T; Takaih M; Suzuki S; Sakahara H
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 May; 179(5):312-9. PubMed ID: 12740658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matching intensity-modulated radiation therapy to an anterior low neck field.
    Amdur RJ; Liu C; Li J; Mendenhall W; Hinerman R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007; 69(2 Suppl):S46-8. PubMed ID: 17848293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New equations for matching a low neck field to oblique upper neck fields with collimator rotation in a 3-field monoisocentric setup for head-and-neck cancers.
    Manske MA; Barker JL; Wong PF; Westlake W; Garden AS; Ang KK; Rosenthal DI
    Med Dosim; 2004; 29(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 15191753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques.
    Higgins PD; Han EY; Yuan JL; Hui S; Lee CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 17264375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choosing an intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique in the treatment of head-and-neck cancer.
    Lee N; Mechalakos J; Puri DR; Hunt M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Aug; 68(5):1299-309. PubMed ID: 17241750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
    Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
    Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SIFT: a method to verify the IMRT fluence delivered during patient treatment using an electronic portal imaging device.
    Vieira SC; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ; de Boer HC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):981-93. PubMed ID: 15465217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dosage inhomogeneities in the matching of opposing photon fields and electron fields in head-neck tumors ].
    Thesen N; Hoevels M; Treuer H
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1995 Apr; 171(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 7740411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of larynx-sparing techniques with IMRT when treating the head and neck.
    Webster GJ; Rowbottom CG; Ho KF; Slevin NJ; Mackay RI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):617-22. PubMed ID: 18793966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study on surface dose generated in prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment.
    Chow JC; Grigorov GN; Barnett RB
    Med Dosim; 2006; 31(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 17134664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of inhomogeneity correction algorithm in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck tumors.
    Yoon M; Lee DH; Shin D; Lee SB; Park SY; Cho KH
    Med Dosim; 2007; 32(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17317535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Field matching in breast irradiation].
    Varga S; Takácsi Nagy L; Pesznyák C; Lövey K; Polgár I
    Magy Onkol; 2001; 45(4):343-346. PubMed ID: 12050698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of breathing motion on intensity modulated radiotherapy in the step-and-shoot technique: phantom measurements for irradiation of superficial target volumes.
    Thilmann C; Häring P; Thilmann L; Unkelbach J; Rhein B; Nill S; Huber P; Janisch E; Thieke C; Debus J
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):N117-26. PubMed ID: 16510947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An interlaced IMRT technique for elongated tumor volumes.
    Meyer J; Richter A; Pfreundner L; Guckenberger M; Krieger T; Schwab F; Flentje M
    Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 19410147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
    Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.