298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16113035)
1. Soft tissue facial profile changes following functional appliance therapy.
Quintão C; Helena I; Brunharo VP; Menezes RC; Almeida MA
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16113035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes.
Sharma AA; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 15821692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile.
Varlik SK; Gültan A; Tümer N
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 18281262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
de Almeida MR; Flores-Mir C; Brandão AG; de Almeida RR; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
Gill DS; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
Hägglund P; Segerdal S; Forsberg CM
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionator.
Lange DW; Kalra V; Broadbent BH; Powers M; Nelson S
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 8702068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A longitudinal evaluation of the skeletal profile of treated and untreated skeletal Class II individuals.
Ramos DS; de Lima EM
Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15747815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of the functional regulator III on profile changes in subjects with maxillary deficiency.
Kilic N; Celikoglu M; Oktay H
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 20453006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 10371429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
Flores-Mir C; Barnett G; Higgins DW; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
