154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16113711)
1. Australian women's experience with Implanon.
Weisberg E; Fraser I
Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Aug; 34(8):694-6. PubMed ID: 16113711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Etonogestrel implant as a contraceptive choice; patient acceptability and adverse effect profile in a general practice setting.
Riney S; O'Shea B; Forde A
Ir Med J; 2009 Jan; 102(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 19284015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implanon users are less likely to be satisfied with their contraception after 6 months than IUD users.
Wong RC; Bell RJ; Thunuguntla K; McNamee K; Vollenhoven B
Contraception; 2009 Nov; 80(5):452-6. PubMed ID: 19835719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel.
Funk S; Miller MM; Mishell DR; Archer DF; Poindexter A; Schmidt J; Zampaglione E;
Contraception; 2005 May; 71(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 15854630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A three-year comparative study of continuation rates, bleeding patterns and satisfaction in Australian women using a subdermal contraceptive implant or progestogen releasing-intrauterine system.
Weisberg E; Bateson D; McGeechan K; Mohapatra L
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2014 Feb; 19(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 24229367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Side effects and acceptability of Implanon: a pilot study conducted in eastern Turkey.
Yildizbas B; Sahin HG; Kolusari A; Zeteroglu S; Kamaci M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2007 Sep; 12(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 17763263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical profile of Implanon: a single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant.
Croxatto HB
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():21-8. PubMed ID: 11246604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuation rates and reasons for removal among Implanon users accessing two family planning clinics in Queensland, Australia.
Harvey C; Seib C; Lucke J
Contraception; 2009 Dec; 80(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 19913146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety, efficacy and acceptability of implanon a single rod implantable contraceptive (etonogestrel) in University of Benin Teaching Hospital.
Aisien AO; Enosolease ME
Niger J Clin Pract; 2010 Sep; 13(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 20857796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implanon. The new alternative.
Cherry S
Aust Fam Physician; 2002 Oct; 31(10):897-900. PubMed ID: 12404826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-year assessment of women receiving sub-dermal contraceptive implant at Siriraj Family Planning Clinic.
Thamkhantho M; Jivasak-Apimas S; Angsuwathana S; Chiravacharadej G; Intawong J
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91(6):775-80. PubMed ID: 18697372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patients' perspectives about why they have their contraceptive Implanon NXT device removed early.
Flore M; Chen XL; Bonney A; Mullan J; Dijkmans-Hadley B; Hodgkins A; Evans G; Frew H; Lloyd G
Aust Fam Physician; 2016 Oct; 45(10):740-744. PubMed ID: 27695725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.
Ireland LD; Goyal V; Raker CA; Murray A; Allen RH
Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 24973904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of Implanon on menstrual bleeding patterns.
Mansour D; Korver T; Marintcheva-Petrova M; Fraser IS
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():13-28. PubMed ID: 18330814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insertion and 3-year follow-up experience of 372 etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implants by family physicians in Granada, Spain.
Arribas-Mir L; Rueda-Lozano D; Agrela-Cardona M; Cedeño-Benavides T; Olvera-Porcel C; Bueno-Cavanillas A
Contraception; 2009 Nov; 80(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 19835720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insertion and removal of Implanon: practical considerations.
Mascarenhas L
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():29-34. PubMed ID: 11246605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tolerability and clinical safety of Implanon.
Blumenthal PD; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Marintcheva-Petrova M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2008 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():29-36. PubMed ID: 18330815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implanon sub-dermal implants: a 10-month review of acceptability in Jos, North-Central Nigeria.
Mutihir JT; Daru PH
Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):320-3. PubMed ID: 19320403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "I think it depends on the body, with mine it didn't work": explaining young women's contraceptive implant removal.
Hoggart L; Newton VL; Dickson J
Contraception; 2013 Nov; 88(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 23829976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A pilot study to assess the effect of three short-term treatments on frequent and/or prolonged bleeding compared to placebo in women using Implanon.
Weisberg E; Hickey M; Palmer D; O'Connor V; Salamonsen LA; Findlay JK; Fraser IS
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jan; 21(1):295-302. PubMed ID: 16284061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
