These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16113758)

  • 1. The digital pen and paper. Evaluation and acceptance of a new data acquisition device in clinical settings.
    Despont-Gros C; Landau R; Rutschmann O; Simon J; Lovis C
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 16113758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptance and cognitive load in a clinical setting of a novel device allowing natural real-time data acquisition.
    Despont-Gros C; Rutschmann O; Geissbuhler A; Lovis C
    Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(11-12):850-5. PubMed ID: 17161649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revealing triage behaviour patterns in ER using a new technology for handwritten data acquisition.
    Despont-Gros C; Cohen G; Rutschmann OT; Geissbuhler A; Lovis C
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Sep; 78(9):579-87. PubMed ID: 19423385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The feasibility of digital pen and paper technology for vital sign data capture in acute care settings.
    Dykes PC; Benoit A; Chang F; Gallagher J; Li Q; Spurr C; McGrath EJ; Kilroy SM; Prater M
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():229-33. PubMed ID: 17238337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The digital pen and paper technology: implementation and use in an existing clinical information system.
    Despont-Gros C; Bœuf C; Geissbuhler A; Lovis C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 116():328-33. PubMed ID: 16160280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usability testing of digital pen and paper system in nursing documentation.
    Yen PY; Gorman P
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():844-8. PubMed ID: 16779159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of user acceptance of information systems in health care--the value of questionnaires.
    Ammenwerth E; Kaiser F; Wilhelmy I; Höfer S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():643-8. PubMed ID: 14664060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system.
    Quinzio L; Junger A; Gottwald B; Benson M; Hartmann B; Jost A; Banzhaf A; Hempelmann G
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Dec; 20(12):967-72. PubMed ID: 14690099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value of wireless personal digital assistants for practice: perceptions of advanced practice nurses.
    Garrett B; Klein G
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2146-54. PubMed ID: 18705736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pen-based computing: applications in clinical medicine.
    Bergeron BP
    J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 16(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 11280205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information technology acceptance in health information management.
    Abdekhoda M; Ahmadi M; Dehnad A; Hosseini AF
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 24248003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human factors considerations relevant to CPOE implementations.
    Saathoff A
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2005; 19(3):71-8. PubMed ID: 16045087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital Pen & Paper® technology to manage clinical risk and to prevent medical malpractice claims].
    Genovese U; Del Sordo S; Gerosa C; Mobilia F; Raineri M
    Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2014; 70(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 25008227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usability of a barcode scanning system as a means of data entry on a PDA for self-report health outcome questionnaires: a pilot study in individuals over 60 years of age.
    Boissy P; Jacobs K; Roy SH
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Dec; 6():42. PubMed ID: 17184533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public Health Survey in a Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Ethiopia: Randomized Controlled Crossover Health Care Information Technology Evaluation.
    Zeleke AA; Worku AG; Demissie A; Otto-Sobotka F; Wilken M; Lipprandt M; Tilahun B; Röhrig R
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e10995. PubMed ID: 30741642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated personal health inventory for dentistry: a pilot study.
    Berthelsen CL; Stilley KR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 10649873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. User acceptance of clinical information systems: a methodological approach to identify the key dimensions allowing a reliable evaluation framework.
    Despont-Gros C; Fabry P; Muller H; Geissbuhler A; Lovis C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1038-42. PubMed ID: 15360970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The user in the design process of an EPR.
    van der Meijden MJ; Tange HJ; Boiten J; Troost J; Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():224-8. PubMed ID: 11187546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A usability study of CPOE's medication administration functions: impact on physician-nurse cooperation.
    Beuscart-Zéphir MC; Pelayo S; Degoulet P; Anceaux F; Guerlinger S; Meaux JJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1018-22. PubMed ID: 15360966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of user satisfaction with a Clinical Information System.
    Palm JM; Colombet I; Sicotte C; Degoulet P
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():614-8. PubMed ID: 17238414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.