BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16113931)

  • 1. Microleakage on Class V glass ionomer restorations after cavity preparation with aluminum oxide air abrasion.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Rocha RA; Palma-Dibb RG
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16113931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of air abrasion preparation on microleakage in glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Reis Lda S; Chinelatti MA; Corona SA; Palma-Dibb RG; Borsatto MC
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1213-6. PubMed ID: 15880930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
    Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation.
    Corona SA; Borsatto M; Dibb RG; Ramos RP; Brugnera A; Pécora JD
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 11551014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does pretreatment of cavities effectively promote good marginal adaptation of glass-ionomer cements?
    Arweiler NB; Auschill TM; Reich E
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 11317375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
    Bansal D; Mahajan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study.
    Hallett KB; Garcia-Godoy F
    Dent Mater; 1993 Sep; 9(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 7995482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
    Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
    Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment.
    Atoui JA; Chinelatti MA; Palma-Dibb RG; Corona SA
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 20835580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of cavity design on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
    Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz UB
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9545918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Pecora JD; De SA Rocha RA; Ramos TS; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 30(10):1008-14. PubMed ID: 12974861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials.
    Bouschlicher MR; Vargas MA; Denehy GE
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):90-5. PubMed ID: 9002867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.