262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16113931)
21. The effects of surface pretreatment on the microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restorations.
Bayrak S; Sen TE; Tuloglu N
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 36(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 22838231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative Assessment of Marginal Micro Leakage of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Used on Primary Teeth: An
Al Ghwainem A; Alqarni AS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 38514432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth.
Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu I; Ulusu T; Genç Y
J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):481-6. PubMed ID: 10960751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro microleakage of Biodentine as a dentin substitute compared to Fuji II LC in cervical lining restorations.
Raskin A; Eschrich G; Dejou J; About I
J Adhes Dent; 2012 Dec; 14(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 22724110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives: Part 1. Conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
Yap AU; Tan S; Teh TY
J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 10672147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of the use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Borsatto MC; Pécora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):430-6. PubMed ID: 15279483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope.
Niranjan B; Shashikiran ND; Singla S; Thakur R; Dubey A; Maran S
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 27681395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
Lim CC; Neo J; Yap A
J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of the marginal integrity of a bioactive restorative material.
Owens BM; Phebus JG; Johnson WW
Gen Dent; 2018; 66(3):32-36. PubMed ID: 29714697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.
Haller B; Trojanski A
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 9927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microleakage of a packable composite associated with different materials.
Loguercio AD; Bauer JR; Reis A; Rodrigues Filho LE; Busato AL
J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 11887513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
Smith ED; Martin FE
Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
