These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16115324)
1. Validity and reproducibility of arterial pulse wave velocity measurement using new device with oscillometric technique: a pilot study. Naidu MU; Reddy BM; Yashmaina S; Patnaik AN; Rani PU Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Aug; 4():49. PubMed ID: 16115324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The correlation of ankle oscillometric blood pressures and segmental pulse volumes to Doppler systolic pressures in arterial occlusive disease. Lee BY; Campbell JS; Berkowitz P J Vasc Surg; 1996 Jan; 23(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 8558726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-invasive assessment of arterial stiffness by pulse-wave velocity correlates with endothelial dysfunction. Jadhav UM; Kadam NN Indian Heart J; 2005; 57(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 16196179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numerical validation of a new method to assess aortic pulse wave velocity from a single recording of a brachial artery waveform with an occluding cuff. Trachet B; Reymond P; Kips J; Swillens A; De Buyzere M; Suys B; Stergiopulos N; Segers P Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 38(3):876-88. PubMed ID: 20127171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a new non-invasive portable tonometer for determining arterial pressure wave and pulse wave velocity: the PulsePen device. Salvi P; Lio G; Labat C; Ricci E; Pannier B; Benetos A J Hypertens; 2004 Dec; 22(12):2285-93. PubMed ID: 15614022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of atherosclerotic indicators between cardio ankle vascular index and brachial ankle pulse wave velocity. Horinaka S; Yabe A; Yagi H; Ishimura K; Hara H; Iemua T; Matsuoka H Angiology; 2009; 60(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 19015165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of oscillometric aortic pressure and stiffness assessment using the VaSera VS-1500: comparison with a common tonometric method. Endes S; Bachler M; Li Y; Mayer C; Hanssen H; Hametner B; Schmidt-Trucksäss A; Wassertheurer S Blood Press Monit; 2015 Oct; 20(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 26065840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of automated brachial ankle pulse wave velocity measurements in hypertensive patients. Munakata M; Ito N; Nunokawa T; Yoshinaga K Am J Hypertens; 2003 Aug; 16(8):653-7. PubMed ID: 12878371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing oscillometric and tonometric methods to assess pulse wave velocity: a population-based study. Del Giorno R; Troiani C; Gabutti S; Stefanelli K; Gabutti L Ann Med; 2021 Dec; 53(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 32729734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated oscillometric blood pressure and pulse-wave acquisition for evaluation of vascular stiffness in atherosclerosis. Massmann A; Stemler J; Fries P; Kubale R; Kraushaar LE; Buecker A Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 106(7):514-524. PubMed ID: 28168512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arterial compliance probe for cuffless evaluation of carotid pulse pressure. Joseph J; P M N; Shah MI; Sivaprakasam M PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202480. PubMed ID: 30114216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-invasive determination of instantaneous brachial blood flow using the oscillometric method. Liu SH; Wang JJ; Cheng DC Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Aug; 54(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19807282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of arterial stiffness indices (pulse wave velocity and augmentation index) simultaneously assessed by automated pulse wave analysis and their associated risk factors in essential hypertensive patients. Matsui Y; Kario K; Ishikawa J; Eguchi K; Hoshide S; Shimada K Hypertens Res; 2004 Nov; 27(11):851-7. PubMed ID: 15824467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New index of regional arterial stiffness assessed by tissue Doppler imaging. Haiden M; Kimura Y; Miyasaka Y; Aota Y; Dote K; Takada A; Iwasaka T Acta Cardiol; 2008 Oct; 63(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 19014004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of pulse wave velocity using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound: comparison with arterial tonometry. Jiang B; Liu B; McNeill KL; Chowienczyk PJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 34(3):509-12. PubMed ID: 18031922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pulse wave velocity and digital volume pulse as indirect estimators of blood pressure: pilot study on healthy volunteers. Padilla JM; Berjano EJ; Sáiz J; Rodriguez R; Fácila L Cardiovasc Eng; 2009 Sep; 9(3):104-12. PubMed ID: 19657733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-invasive 24 hour ambulatory monitoring of aortic wave reflection and arterial stiffness by a novel oscillometric device: the first feasibility and reproducibility study. Papaioannou TG; Argyris A; Protogerou AD; Vrachatis D; Nasothimiou EG; Sfikakis PP; Stergiou GS; Stefanadis CI Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 169(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 24063914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Vicorder device compared with SphygmoCor in the assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Shahin Y; Barakat H; Barnes R; Chetter I Hypertens Res; 2013 Mar; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 23034469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Validation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement Using a Multi-Beam Laser Vibrometer: The CARDIS Study. Badhwar S; Marais L; Khettab H; Poli F; Li Y; Segers P; Aasmul S; de Melis M; Baets R; Greenwald S; Bruno RM; Boutouyrie P Hypertension; 2024 Sep; 81(9):1986-1995. PubMed ID: 38934112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method. Špan M; Geršak G; Millasseau SC; Meža M; Košir A Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2016; 12():305-11. PubMed ID: 27536125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]