These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16118009)

  • 1. Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving.
    Wittmann M; Kiss M; Gugg P; Steffen A; Fink M; Pöppel E; Kamiya H
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Mar; 37(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 16118009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems.
    Liu YC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Mar; 44(4):425-42. PubMed ID: 11291824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.
    Wang Y; Mehler B; Reimer B; Lammers V; D'Ambrosio LA; Coughlin JF
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 20191415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: a comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation.
    Mitsopoulos-Rubens E; Trotter MJ; Lenné MG
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):583-91. PubMed ID: 20869694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.
    Yan X; Abdel-Aty M; Radwan E; Wang X; Chilakapati P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):274-88. PubMed ID: 18215559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction.
    Noy YI; Lemoine TL; Klachan C; Burns PC
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 15145283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The consequences of an increase in heavy goods vehicles for passenger car drivers' mental workload and behaviour: a simulator study.
    de Waard D; Kruizinga A; Brookhuis KA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):818-28. PubMed ID: 18329437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driving with a Congestion Assistant; mental workload and acceptance.
    Brookhuis KA; van Driel CJ; Hof T; van Arem B; Hoedemaeker M
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Nov; 40(6):1019-25. PubMed ID: 18823875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of drivers' age and push button locations on visual time off road, steering wheel deviation and safety perception.
    Dukic T; Hanson L; Falkmer T
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jan; 49(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 16393805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.
    Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of subjective questionnaires to cognitive loading while driving with navigation aids: a pilot study.
    Smyth CC
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B39-50. PubMed ID: 17547303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task performance and eye activity: predicting behavior relating to cognitive workload.
    Tsai YF; Viirre E; Strychacz C; Chase B; Jung TP
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B176-85. PubMed ID: 17547318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of menu structure and touch screen scrolling style on the variability of glance durations during in-vehicle visual search tasks.
    Kujala T; Saariluoma P
    Ergonomics; 2011 Aug; 54(8):716-32. PubMed ID: 21846310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the highway measures of driver glance behavior with an example automobile navigation system.
    Chiang DP; Brooks AM; Weir DH
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 15145284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Event-related potentials and secondary task performance during simulated driving.
    Wester AE; Böcker KB; Volkerts ER; Verster JC; Kenemans JL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18215526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of touch-key size on the usability of In-Vehicle Information Systems and driving safety during simulated driving.
    Kim H; Kwon S; Heo J; Lee H; Chung MK
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 23759791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociation between driving performance and drivers' subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF; Garabet A
    J Safety Res; 2009; 40(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 19285580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligent speed adaptation--effects and acceptance by young inexperienced drivers.
    Young KL; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Jontof-Hutter K; Newstead S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):935-43. PubMed ID: 20380923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.