These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16118155)

  • 1. Bone invasion in patients with oral cavity cancer: comparison of conventional CT with PET/CT and SPECT/CT.
    Goerres GW; Schmid DT; Schuknecht B; Eyrich GK
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):281-7. PubMed ID: 16118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone and soft-tissue sarcoma: preoperative staging with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and conventional imaging.
    Tateishi U; Yamaguchi U; Seki K; Terauchi T; Arai Y; Kim EE
    Radiology; 2007 Dec; 245(3):839-47. PubMed ID: 18024454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of recurrent bone and soft tissue sarcoma.
    Al-Ibraheem A; Buck AK; Benz MR; Rudert M; Beer AJ; Mansour A; Pomykala KL; Haller B; Juenger H; Scheidhauer K; Schwaiger M; Herrmann K
    Cancer; 2013 Mar; 119(6):1227-34. PubMed ID: 23233156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.
    Ng SH; Yen TC; Liao CT; Chang JT; Chan SC; Ko SF; Wang HM; Wong HF
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Jul; 46(7):1136-43. PubMed ID: 16000282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT, MR, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity.
    Gu DH; Yoon DY; Park CH; Chang SK; Lim KJ; Seo YL; Yun EJ; Choi CS; Bae SH
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1111-9. PubMed ID: 20929295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment--utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT.
    Ohno Y; Koyama H; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Kotani Y; Sugimura K
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 18539889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
    Kauhanen SP; Komar G; Seppänen MP; Dean KI; Minn HR; Kajander SA; Rinta-Kiikka I; Alanen K; Borra RJ; Puolakkainen PA; Nuutila P; Ovaska JT
    Ann Surg; 2009 Dec; 250(6):957-63. PubMed ID: 19687736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT compared to standard contrast-enhanced CT for characterization and staging of pulmonary tumors eligible for surgical resection.
    Quaia E; Tona G; Gelain F; Lubin E; Pizzolato R; Boscolo E; Bussoli L
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Nov; 49(9):995-1004. PubMed ID: 18651256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases?
    Heusner T; Gölitz P; Hamami M; Eberhardt W; Esser S; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19945240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography enhances computed tomography diagnosis of malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.
    Sperti C; Bissoli S; Pasquali C; Frison L; Liessi G; Chierichetti F; Pedrazzoli S
    Ann Surg; 2007 Dec; 246(6):932-7; discussion 937-9. PubMed ID: 18043094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-line (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with carcinoma of the sinus/nasal area and orbit.
    Wild D; Eyrich GK; Ciernik IF; Stoeckli SJ; Schuknecht B; Goerres GW
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 34(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16343913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning with 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detection of pelvic nodal involvement in inguinal node-positive penile carcinoma.
    Graafland NM; Leijte JA; Valdés Olmos RA; Hoefnagel CA; Teertstra HJ; Horenblas S
    Eur Urol; 2009 Aug; 56(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 19477581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of [18F]FDG-PET and coregistered CT on clinical target volume definition of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Messa C; Ceresoli GL; Rizzo G; Artioli D; Cattaneo M; Castellone P; Gregorc V; Picchio M; Landoni C; Fazio F
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Sep; 49(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 16172572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection and restaging of residual and/or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma after chemotherapy and radiation therapy: comparison of MR imaging and FDG PET/CT.
    Comoretto M; Balestreri L; Borsatti E; Cimitan M; Franchin G; Lise M
    Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):203-11. PubMed ID: 18710963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases.
    Seo HJ; Kim MJ; Lee JD; Chung WS; Kim YE
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):548-55. PubMed ID: 21577131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.
    Even-Sapir E; Metser U; Mishani E; Lievshitz G; Lerman H; Leibovitch I
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16455635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography of breast cancer in detecting axillary lymph node metastasis: comparison with ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT.
    Monzawa S; Adachi S; Suzuki K; Hirokaga K; Takao S; Sakuma T; Hanioka K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Dec; 23(10):855-61. PubMed ID: 19876704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective comparison of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in patients with melanoma with palpable lymph node metastases: diagnostic accuracy and impact on treatment.
    Bastiaannet E; Wobbes T; Hoekstra OS; van der Jagt EJ; Brouwers AH; Koelemij R; de Klerk JM; Oyen WJ; Meijer S; Hoekstra HJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 27(28):4774-80. PubMed ID: 19720925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone invasion in oral cancer patients: a comparison between Orthopantamograph, conventional computed tomography, and single positron emission computed tomography.
    Kushraj T; Chatra L; Shenai P; Rao PK
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2011; 7(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 22269406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx: FDG PET with contrast-enhanced CT in the posttreatment setting.
    King KG; Kositwattanarerk A; Genden E; Kao J; Som PM; Kostakoglu L
    Radiographics; 2011; 31(2):355-73. PubMed ID: 21415184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.