These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16118503)

  • 1. Evaluation of Nyholt's procedure for multiple testing correction.
    Salyakina D; Seaman SR; Browning BL; Dudbridge F; Muller-Myhsok B
    Hum Hered; 2005; 60(1):19-25; discussion 61-2. PubMed ID: 16118503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Nyholt's procedure for multiple testing correction - author's reply.
    Nyholt DR
    Hum Hered; 2005; 60(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 16137994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of type I error for multiple test corrections in large single-nucleotide polymorphism studies using principal components versus haplotype blocking algorithms.
    Nicodemus KK; Liu W; Chase GA; Tsai YY; Fallin MD
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S78. PubMed ID: 16451692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High resolution T association tests of complex diseases based on family data.
    Fan R; Knapp M; Wjst M; Zhao C; Xiong M
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Mar; 69(Pt 2):187-208. PubMed ID: 15720300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the advantage of haplotype analysis in the presence of multiple disease susceptibility alleles.
    Morris RW; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Oct; 23(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 12384975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: the SIMPle analysis for multilocus data.
    Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):429-41. PubMed ID: 15543635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing association between disease and multiple SNPs in a candidate gene.
    Gauderman WJ; Murcray C; Gilliland F; Conti DV
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 31(5):383-95. PubMed ID: 17410554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new measure of the effective number of tests, a practical tool for comparing families of non-independent significance tests.
    Galwey NW
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 33(7):559-68. PubMed ID: 19217024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic association mapping under founder heterogeneity via weighted haplotype similarity analysis in candidate genes.
    Yu K; Gu CC; Province M; Xiong CJ; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 27(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 15389925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Haplotype sharing analysis using mantel statistics.
    Beckmann L; Thomas DC; Fischer C; Chang-Claude J
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 15838176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High density linkage disequilibrium mapping using models of haplotype block variation.
    Greenspan G; Geiger D
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i137-44. PubMed ID: 15262792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association analysis of the RGS4 gene in Han Chinese and Scottish populations with schizophrenia.
    Zhang F; St Clair D; Liu X; Sun X; Sham PC; Crombie C; Ma X; Wang Q; Meng H; Deng W; Yates P; Hu X; Walker N; Murray RM; Collier DA; Li T
    Genes Brain Behav; 2005 Oct; 4(7):444-8. PubMed ID: 16176390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fine mapping functional sites or regions from case-control data using haplotypes of multiple linked SNPs.
    Cheng R; Ma JZ; Elston RC; Li MD
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Jan; 69(Pt 1):102-12. PubMed ID: 15638831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal selection of SNP markers for disease association studies.
    Halldórsson BV; Istrail S; De La Vega FM
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):190-202. PubMed ID: 15812176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for haplotype uncertainty in matched association studies: a comparison of simple and flexible techniques.
    Kraft P; Cox DG; Paynter RA; Hunter D; De Vivo I
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 28(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 15637718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of single SNPs, haplotypes, and whole-genome LD maps on accuracy of association mapping.
    Maniatis N; Collins A; Morton NE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 31(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 17285621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [How about the uncertainty in the haplotypes in the population-based KORA studies?].
    Heid IM; Lamina C; Bongardt F; Fischer G; Klopp N; Huth C; Küchenhoff H; Kronenberg F; Wichmann HE; Illig T
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Aug; 67 Suppl 1():S132-6. PubMed ID: 16032531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of catechol-O-methyltransferase SNPs and haplotypes on treatment response phenotypes in major depressive disorder: a case-control association study.
    Kocabas NA; Faghel C; Barreto M; Kasper S; Linotte S; Mendlewicz J; Noro M; Oswald P; Souery D; Zohar J; Massat I
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Jul; 25(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 20531207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.