These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1611889)

  • 1. Automated detection and classification of breast tumors.
    Ng SL; Bischof WF
    Comput Biomed Res; 1992 Jun; 25(3):218-37. PubMed ID: 1611889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
    Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification of mammographic masses using generalized dynamic fuzzy neural networks.
    Lim WK; Er MJ
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1288-95. PubMed ID: 15191321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of an automated method for detecting mammographic masses with a partial loss of region.
    Hatanaka Y; Hara T; Fujita H; Kasai S; Endo T; Iwase T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1209-14. PubMed ID: 11811821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network.
    Chan HP; Lo SC; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 1995 Oct; 22(10):1555-67. PubMed ID: 8551980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program.
    te Brake GM; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 9577496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification.
    Petrick N; Chan HP; Wei D; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD
    Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1685-96. PubMed ID: 8946366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography.
    Li L; Clark RA; Thomas JA
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11918357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of tolerant features for characterization of masses in mammograms.
    Rojas-Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Aug; 39(8):678-88. PubMed ID: 19524221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.
    Elter M; Horsch A
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2052-68. PubMed ID: 19610294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
    Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False positive reduction in mammographic mass detection using local binary patterns.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí J
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):286-93. PubMed ID: 18051070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.
    Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1629-38. PubMed ID: 15551535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.