These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16119254)

  • 1. Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 May; 16(5):270-7. PubMed ID: 16119254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN; Tardy B; Hedrick M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):103-114. PubMed ID: 30461384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Stangl E
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 23334355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies.
    Bentler R; Wu YH; Kettel J; Hurtig R
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):447-60. PubMed ID: 18698521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Digital Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids on Speech Intelligibility in Both Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Deniz B; Gülmez ZD; Kara H; Kara E
    Noise Health; 2024 Apr-Jun 01; 26(121):220-225. PubMed ID: 38904826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptation of the BKB-SIN test for use as a pediatric aided outcome measure.
    Ng SL; Meston CN; Scollie SD; Seewald RC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jun; 22(6):375-86. PubMed ID: 21864474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.
    Gustafson S; McCreery R; Hoover B; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz P
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 24473240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
    Kortlang S; Chen Z; Gerkmann T; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of maximum power output and noise reduction on speech recognition in noise.
    Kuk F; Peeters H; Lau C; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 21756842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.
    Mueller HG; Weber J; Hornsby BW
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 16959732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid.
    Alcántara JL; Moore BC; Kühnel V; Launer S
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jan; 42(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 12564514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of multichannel digital signal processing on loudness comfort, sentence recognition, and sound quality.
    Mispagel KM; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006; 17(10):681-707. PubMed ID: 17153718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal-to-noise.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):528-41. PubMed ID: 22031677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
    Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.