These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16119254)

  • 21. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
    Holder JT; Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital noise reduction hearing aids in adults.
    Lakshmi MSK; Rout A; O'Donoghue CR
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Feb; 16(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 31502900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal levels.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):515-27. PubMed ID: 22031676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions.
    Mackenzie E; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of a Deep Recurrent Neural Network to Reduce Wind Noise: Effects on Judged Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality.
    Keshavarzi M; Goehring T; Zakis J; Turner RE; Moore BCJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518770964. PubMed ID: 29708061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modulation-based digital noise reduction for application to hearing protectors to reduce noise and maintain intelligibility.
    Chung K; Tufts J; Nelson L
    Hum Factors; 2009 Feb; 51(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 19634311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Directivity and noise reduction in hearing aids: speech perception and benefit.
    Quintino CA; Mondelli MF; Ferrari DV
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 76(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 20963348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
    Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):547-62. PubMed ID: 26134722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
    Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of array-processing algorithms for a headband hearing aid.
    Greenberg JE; Desloge JG; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1646-57. PubMed ID: 12656398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adaptive noise suppression for a dual-microphone hearing aid.
    Wouters J; Berghe JV; Maj JB
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):401-7. PubMed ID: 12403608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison between the first-fit settings of two multichannel digital signal-processing strategies: music quality ratings and speech-in-noise scores.
    Higgins P; Searchfield G; Coad G
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 21(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 22361320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rehabilitation for high-frequency sensorineural hearing impairment in adults with the symphonix vibrant soundbridge: a comparative study.
    Uziel A; Mondain M; Hagen P; Dejean F; Doucet G
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):775-83. PubMed ID: 14501456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.