These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16119370)

  • 1. Characterizing noise in nonhuman vocalizations: Acoustic analysis and human perception of barks by coyotes and dogs.
    Riede T; Mitchell BR; Tokuda I; Owren MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):514-22. PubMed ID: 16119370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can humans discriminate between dogs on the base of the acoustic parameters of barks?
    Molnár C; Pongrácz P; Dóka A; Miklósi A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 16678361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The harmonic-to-noise ratio applied to dog barks.
    Riede T; Herzel H; Hammerschmidt K; Brunnberg L; Tembrock G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2191-7. PubMed ID: 11681395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contextual effects of noise on vocalization encoding in primary auditory cortex.
    Ni R; Bender DA; Shanechi AM; Gamble JR; Barbour DL
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Feb; 117(2):713-727. PubMed ID: 27881720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations.
    Pongrácz P; Molnár C; Miklósi A; Csányi V
    J Comp Psychol; 2005 May; 119(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 15982157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonlinear analysis of irregular animal vocalizations.
    Tokuda I; Riede T; Neubauer J; Owren MJ; Herzel H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2908-19. PubMed ID: 12083224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic structures in the alarm calls of Gunnison's prairie dogs.
    Slobodchikoff CN; Placer J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3153-60. PubMed ID: 16708970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination of acoustically similar conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).
    Hahn AH; Campbell KA; Congdon JV; Hoang J; McMillan N; Scully EN; Yong JJH; Elie JE; Sturdy CB
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Jul; 20(4):639-654. PubMed ID: 28393311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dogs discriminate between barks: the effect of context and identity of the caller.
    Molnár C; Pongrácz P; Faragó T; Dóka A; Miklósi A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 19596426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification of dog barks: a machine learning approach.
    Molnár C; Kaplan F; Roy P; Pachet F; Pongrácz P; Dóka A; Miklósi A
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jul; 11(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 18197442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual and acoustic evidence for species-level differences in meow vocalizations by domestic cats (Felis catus) and African wild cats (Felis silvestris lybica).
    Nicastro N
    J Comp Psychol; 2004 Sep; 118(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 15482056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human listeners' perception of behavioural context and core affect dimensions in chimpanzee vocalizations.
    Kamiloğlu RG; Slocombe KE; Haun DBM; Sauter DA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jun; 287(1929):20201148. PubMed ID: 32546102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeing with ears: Sightless humans' perception of dog bark provides a test for structural rules in vocal communication.
    Molnár C; Pongrácz P; Miklósi A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):1004-13. PubMed ID: 19760535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing supervised learning methods for classifying sex, age, context and individual Mudi dogs from barking.
    Larrañaga A; Bielza C; Pongrácz P; Faragó T; Bálint A; Larrañaga P
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Mar; 18(2):405-21. PubMed ID: 25308549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barking in family dogs: an ethological approach.
    Pongrácz P; Molnár C; Miklósi A
    Vet J; 2010 Feb; 183(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 19181546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are temporal features crucial acoustic cues in dog vocal recognition?
    Siniscalchi M; Lusito R; Sasso R; Quaranta A
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Sep; 15(5):815-21. PubMed ID: 22544303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ontogeny of expression of communicative genes in coyote-beagle hybrids.
    Moon-Fanelli A
    Behav Genet; 2011 Nov; 41(6):858-75. PubMed ID: 21573986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting the effect of urban noise on the active space of avian vocal signals.
    Parris KM; McCarthy MA
    Am Nat; 2013 Oct; 182(4):452-64. PubMed ID: 24021398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Associations between the Transsexual Voice Questionnaire (TVQ
    Dacakis G; Oates J; Douglas J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Nov; 52(6):831-838. PubMed ID: 28425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infants' intermodal perception of canine (Canis familairis) facial expressions and vocalizations.
    Flom R; Whipple H; Hyde D
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Jul; 45(4):1143-51. PubMed ID: 19586184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.