These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16119730)

  • 1. Optimizing the femoral component cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty.
    Dennis DA; Lynch CB
    Orthopedics; 2005 Aug; 28(8 Suppl):s867-71. PubMed ID: 16119730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term aseptic loosening of the femoral component in canine total hip replacement: effects of cementing technique on cement mantle grade.
    Ota J; Cook JL; Lewis DD; Tomlinson JL; Fox DB; Cook CR; Schultz LG; Brumitt J
    Vet Surg; 2005; 34(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16212589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
    Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Femoral Head Size, Subject Weight, and Activity Level on Acetabular Cement Mantle Stress Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Del-Valle-Mojica JF; Alonso-Rasgado T; Jimenez-Cruz D; Bailey CG; Board TN
    J Orthop Res; 2019 Aug; 37(8):1771-1783. PubMed ID: 30977550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of proximal cement filling of the calcar region: a biomechanical justification.
    Ayers D; Mann K
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Oct; 18(7 Suppl 1):103-9. PubMed ID: 14560418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of stem geometry on stresses within the distal cement mantle in total hip replacement.
    Schmölz W; Gordon DR; Shields AJ; Kirkwood D; Grigoris P
    Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10942992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cement interface and bone stress in total hip arthroplasty: Relationship to head size.
    Alonso-Rasgado T; Del-Valle-Mojica JF; Jimenez-Cruz D; Bailey CG; Board TN
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Nov; 36(11):2966-2977. PubMed ID: 29774956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational assessment of the effect of polyethylene wear rate, mantle thickness, and porosity on the mechanical failure of the acetabular cement mantle.
    Coultrup OJ; Hunt C; Wroblewski BM; Taylor M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19950359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding.
    Verdonschot N; Tanck E; Huiskes R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Dec; 42(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 9827679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of modular neck variation on bone and cement mantle mechanics around a total hip arthroplasty stem.
    Simpson DJ; Little JP; Gray H; Murray DW; Gill HS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Mar; 24(3):274-85. PubMed ID: 19263573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of cup outer sizes on the contact mechanics and cement fixation of cemented total hip replacements.
    Hua X; Li J; Wang L; Wilcox R; Fisher J; Jin Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Oct; 37(10):1008-14. PubMed ID: 26343226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The significance of the micropores at the stem-cement interface in total hip replacement.
    Zhang H; Blunt L; Jiang X; Brown L; Barrans S
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2011; 22(7):845-56. PubMed ID: 21144164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone creep and short and long term subsidence after cemented stem total hip arthroplasty (THA).
    Norman TL; Shultz T; Noble G; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2013 Mar; 46(5):949-55. PubMed ID: 23357700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing of femoral prosthesis insertion during cemented arthroplasty: cement curing and static mechanical strength in an in vivo model.
    Hunt S; Stone C; Seal S
    Can J Surg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21251430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals.
    Maloney WJ; Schmalzried T; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Dec; (405):70-8. PubMed ID: 12461358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years.
    Haydon CM; Mehin R; Burnett S; Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jun; 86(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 15173290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suboptimal (thin) distal cement mantle thickness as a contributory factor in total hip arthroplasty femoral component failure. A retrospective radiographic analysis favoring distal stem centralization.
    Star MJ; Colwell CW; Kelman GJ; Ballock RT; Walker RH
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Apr; 9(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 8014645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of surface topography on wear debris generation at the cement/bone interface under cyclic loading.
    Stoffel KA; Yang DT; Arola D
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 May; 19(5):1935-43. PubMed ID: 17934799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.