These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16120442)

  • 1. Three-dimensional dynamic hip contact area and pressure distribution during activities of daily living.
    Yoshida H; Faust A; Wilckens J; Kitagawa M; Fetto J; Chao EY
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(11):1996-2004. PubMed ID: 16120442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
    Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of impingement and dysplasia on stress distributions in the hip joint during sitting and walking: a finite element analysis.
    Chegini S; Beck M; Ferguson SJ
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Feb; 27(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 18752280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing.
    Heller MO; Bergmann G; Kassi JP; Claes L; Haas NP; Duda GN
    J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1155-63. PubMed ID: 15797596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of motion patterns on edge-loading of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Mellon SJ; Kwon YM; Glyn-Jones S; Murray DW; Gill HS
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Dec; 33(10):1212-20. PubMed ID: 21705257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement.
    Jonkers I; Sauwen N; Lenaerts G; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Jaecques S
    J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3405-13. PubMed ID: 19019372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of the lateral rotators on load transfer in the human hip joint revealed by mechanical analysis.
    Weißgraeber P; V D Wall H; Khabbazeh S; Kroker AM; Becker W
    Ann Anat; 2012 Sep; 194(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 22694841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acetabular loading in active abduction.
    Kristan A; Mavcic B; Cimerman M; Iglis A; Tonin M; Slivnik T; Kralj-Iglic V; Daniel M
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Jun; 15(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 17601195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of 3D physiological loading and motion on elastohydrodynamic lubrication of metal-on-metal total hip replacements.
    Gao L; Wang F; Yang P; Jin Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jul; 31(6):720-9. PubMed ID: 19269879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo contact stresses during activities of daily living after knee arthroplasty.
    D'Lima DD; Steklov N; Fregly BJ; Banks SA; Colwell CW
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1549-55. PubMed ID: 18524001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The clinical relevance of biomechanical analysis of the hip area].
    Kummer B
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1991; 129(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 1833916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Stress distribution on the femoral neck at different abduction angles of the hip joint: a finite element analysis].
    Zhang MC; Shi FL; Zhao WD; Ouyang J; Zhong SZ
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2005 Oct; 25(10):1244-6. PubMed ID: 16234099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subject-specific hip geometry affects predicted hip joint contact forces during gait.
    Lenaerts G; De Groote F; Demeulenaere B; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Spaepen A; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(6):1243-52. PubMed ID: 18346745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluid load support and contact mechanics of hemiarthroplasty in the natural hip joint.
    Pawaskar SS; Ingham E; Fisher J; Jin Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Jan; 33(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 20951626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait.
    Lenaerts G; Bartels W; Gelaude F; Mulier M; Spaepen A; Van der Perre G; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1246-51. PubMed ID: 19464012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parametric analysis of the stress distribution on the articular cartilage and subchondral bone.
    Wang Y; Wei HW; Yu TC; Cheng CK
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2007; 17(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 17611300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Normal hip joint contact pressure distribution in single-leg standing--effect of gender and anatomic parameters.
    Genda E; Iwasaki N; Li G; MacWilliams BA; Barrance PJ; Chao EY
    J Biomech; 2001 Jul; 34(7):895-905. PubMed ID: 11410173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Telemeterized in vivo hip joint force data: a report on two patients after total hip surgery.
    Kotzar GM; Davy DT; Goldberg VM; Heiple KG; Berilla J; Heiple KG; Brown RH; Burstein AH
    J Orthop Res; 1991 Sep; 9(5):621-33. PubMed ID: 1870027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lateral acetabular rotation improves anterior hip subluxation.
    Rab GT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 456():170-5. PubMed ID: 17106271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative determination of joint incongruity and pressure distribution during simulated gait and cartilage thickness in the human hip joint.
    von Eisenhart R; Adam C; Steinlechner M; Müller-Gerbl M; Eckstein F
    J Orthop Res; 1999 Jul; 17(4):532-9. PubMed ID: 10459759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.